FelsensteinsMonster
FelsensteinsMonster t1_j1zszqg wrote
Reply to comment by i_have_thick_loads in Schooling substantially improves intelligence, but neither lessens nor widens the impacts of socioeconomics and genetics by i_have_thick_loads
This study’s post hoc analysis found a similar effect on g though
FelsensteinsMonster t1_j1zswyi wrote
Reply to Schooling substantially improves intelligence, but neither lessens nor widens the impacts of socioeconomics and genetics by i_have_thick_loads
Misleading way to describe the lack of a significant interaction term. The main effect of schooling was larger than both SES and the polygenic score, implying that it could exacerbate or ameliorate IQ gaps “caused” by differences in either factor
FelsensteinsMonster t1_j1zsi73 wrote
Reply to comment by SerialStateLineXer in Schooling substantially improves intelligence, but neither lessens nor widens the impacts of socioeconomics and genetics by i_have_thick_loads
This makes a lot of assumptions about estimates from twins being accurate and ignores that the ostensible predictive gains between a 1 million sample education GWAS and a 3 million sample GWAS was mostly lost when confounders were accounted for. If anything the poor quality of polygenic scores will make non-genetic factors appear genetic in these kinds of models
FelsensteinsMonster t1_j200n32 wrote
Reply to comment by Vito_The_Magnificent in Schooling substantially improves intelligence, but neither lessens nor widens the impacts of socioeconomics and genetics by i_have_thick_loads
It’s this one, check out the sibling analysis compared to whole-sample. https://idp.nature.com/authorize?response_type=cookie&client_id=grover&redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nature.com%2Farticles%2Fs41588-022-01016-z