It's the kind of thing I'd bet on and test on myself to show how confident I was in my shield technology, almost like how people who believe in their bullet proof vests might volunteer to be shot while wearing it.
The key is you then have to make nukes not only ineffective but a liability, if you want to get rid of them all. If the location of a nuke is known there are things that can target it, and potentially cause it to detonate.
Epyon214 t1_iyp2a4g wrote
Reply to comment by DanielNoWrite in Is it possible that nuclear defense technologies will surpass the abilities of nuclear weapons in the future, rendering them near useless? by Wide-Escape-5618
It's the kind of thing I'd bet on and test on myself to show how confident I was in my shield technology, almost like how people who believe in their bullet proof vests might volunteer to be shot while wearing it.
The key is you then have to make nukes not only ineffective but a liability, if you want to get rid of them all. If the location of a nuke is known there are things that can target it, and potentially cause it to detonate.