That doesn't change the fact that hitting a stationary object is always and solely the responsibility of the driver.

You'd be lucky to buy the land alone for a rail line of any useful size for $42 million.

>At this point it’s negligence on the part of Walmart the driver's hitting the pole.

FTFY

I was in line at a VIP when they told the customer ahead of me - in for all four brakes - that they would also charge (full price) for rotating the tires.

Even if they're already married? That seems like an odd exception to bigamy laws.

/s

Fear is a super power.

So the fine per violation is less than $25. That doesn't sound like much deterrent.

Did you get a picture of the sign alone? Perfect r/ScarySigns fodder...

Bollards are a fuck of a lot easier to repair than people, and repairs are cheaper, too.

There are, it seems, conditions in this specific lot which make the consequences of inattention greater, but the root cause of hitting a stationary object with a motor vehicle is driver inattention and negligence.

>there is a reason.

Yes, the reason is negligence by inadequately attentive drivers.

Vinyl seats are hotter.

>Josh Allen is not actually a candidate in the City of Westbrook.

Isn't the whole point of a write-in vote to (try to) elect someone who isn't a registered candidate?

>Votes cast for Josh Allen will be counted as blanks.

So, you admit that the city intends to discount legal write-in votes.

Do you want to directly undermine the integrity of every election your office has any role in counting ballots for? Because that's what you just did.

Regardless of the forum, do you trust the government to even-handedly apply a standard as vague as "community standards"? It's not a question of property, it's a question of censorship.

Fuck censors.

If the State permits custom plates, then the State cannot censor those custom plates based on their content.

So, time to start spamming the censorship committee by reporting every plate that's even vaguely questionable. Including non-vanity plates.

Why, The Government, of course.

You trust them, right?

>Secretary of State Shanna Bellows is leading the process of removing these plates from the road. Bellows is a staunch supporter of freedom of speech...

Apparently, she's not.

Outright seizure is not essential for a taking. In the Great Ponds Act, the land to which access is granted must be unimproved, which is very different than letting people cross and occupy your front lawn, or a maintained beach to which you hitherto charged access fees.

It comes down to the US Constitution. If that property is to be taken for public use - and let's not fool ourselves, that's what we're talking about here - they have to receive "just compensation". How much are we prepared to spend?

It would run into issues with the Federal Constitution's guarantee, in the Fifth Amendment, that "... private property [shall not] be taken for public use, without just compensation." That would get gorram expensive, gorram fast.

Either you cut your wheels hard and back up, and accept that you're going to ding your front bumper fascia again on the way back, or you wait for the tow truck to winch you sideways off her.

At least, that's what it looks like from this one medium-range picture.