ElectricPeterTork
ElectricPeterTork t1_jeci6ut wrote
Reply to comment by kingzilch in Currently on the last season of 'Head of the Class' (random thoughts, no spoilers!) by mikeymiggz
OTOH, another castmember went on to be the guy who runs Nickelodeon, but without creepy overtones.
ElectricPeterTork t1_jeci4cc wrote
Reply to Currently on the last season of 'Head of the Class' (random thoughts, no spoilers!) by mikeymiggz
If you're the person who posted about season 4 a while back, you may recall I said season 5 was worth watching if you enjoy Billy Connolly, because the writers wrote in a reason for Billy to do an extended Billy bit every episode.
I wasn't lying, was I?
Billy being Billy makes the season watchable.
ElectricPeterTork t1_je3bxth wrote
Reply to comment by Kaimuki18 in Wasn’t even in the 80s but the 80s Phoebe Cates is an eternal crush for me by [deleted]
I'd say while "cue" is probably most correct, "queue" is also acceptable.
But "Que that Cars song " just means "What that Cars song" in Spanglish.
ElectricPeterTork t1_jdyw9qk wrote
Reply to comment by DenverHi in Friends in East L.A 1992. by MikeyNapoli
I dunno, but I hear they called her "Ilene".
ElectricPeterTork t1_jdkm3ai wrote
Reply to Bring Back Firefly! by oldandopinionated
Why?
It's been 20 years. The bloom is off the rose with Whedon and he probably wouldn't be asked back. As NuTrek (among other shows) has shown us, revivals like this almost inevitably suck. And a reboot or universe won't have the magic of the show you loved, it'll just be a soulless cash in on a familiar property.
Be happy with the little there was. Treasure it. Because anything new will likely be a horrible mistake that doesn't add anything good, it just tarnishes the original.
ElectricPeterTork t1_jd3htta wrote
Reply to comment by Varekai79 in What TV Shows just go off the rails in later seasons? by Swing-Full
They were spread too thin.
At the same time, essentially the same crew were producing TNG S7, DS9 S2, Creating Voyager and gearing up for its first season, and writing Generations. IIRC, it was so hectic, while they were concentrating on Generations, they forgot to write a finale for TNG, so All Good Things was knocked out as an afterthought.
They had also stopped taking outside submissions by that time, so that cut a source of ideas.
ElectricPeterTork t1_jab5lxt wrote
Reply to comment by Lazlo_Hollyfeld69 in Jenilee Harrison as the annoying Cindy on three's company 1980s by steroidamoeba
Well, as they proved, you remove Suzanne Sommers, the show goes on just about as popular as it was for another 3 or 4 years.
If they'd removed John Ritter? Probably wouldn't have been 4 more years if they'd done that.
So, while it's almost certain she deserved more money because she was a draw, she probably wasn't quite worth irreplaceable star of the show money.
ElectricPeterTork t1_ja6dyxn wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in What four sitcoms would you put on your Mount Rushmore? by Cmyers1980
DOWN WITH THIS SORT OF THING!
ElectricPeterTork t1_j9s913d wrote
Reply to comment by KnotForNow in Taxi, with Judd Hirsch and Danny DeVito, is finally streaming by Downbound92
Disney owns the show now, so good luck.
It was part of the MTM library, which was badly mistreated before Fox bought it. First it was purchased by a British company, then religious huckster Pat Robertson. The original elements were not treated kindly before Fox bought MTM in the late 90s.
When Shout Factory released the series on DVD, they had to use ancient videotape masters, and even resort to pulling YouTube quality clips to reinsert into some episodes to make them as complete as they could get them.
So, Newhart would have to get the TNG/Cheers/Frasier remaster and reassembly treatment to look as good as it could again, and Disney... well, they're not known for that sort of thing the way Paramount is. And that's assuming the original film still exists and is accessible after all the hands it passed through over the years.
ElectricPeterTork t1_j9ppw46 wrote
Reply to comment by dantemanjones in Taxi, with Judd Hirsch and Danny DeVito, is finally streaming by Downbound92
Slow down!
ElectricPeterTork t1_j8ygec2 wrote
Season 4 was not great.
Season 5, however, was pretty good if you like Billy Connolly. Basically, they write in room for him to be Billy at least once an episode.
ElectricPeterTork t1_j67hyov wrote
Reply to comment by kingdazy in A different take on Velma by HBO by borek87
My post about Velma would be "Not interested, didn't watch, amused at the reactions from both directions."
But shit, that's not much of a post. And I don't feel like whipping out the thesaurus to cobble together enough words to express that sentence in a novella.
ElectricPeterTork t1_j65ry32 wrote
Reply to comment by wtfsafrush in Is Seinfeld kind of a flop for Netflix? by BitterEditor22
Nope. Because the average person only cares about their screen being filled, believes black bars steal their souls, and that they didn't pay all that money for no soul stealing black bars to take up part of the screen.
ElectricPeterTork t1_j5tz109 wrote
Reply to comment by OoOoReillys in A Customer on the internet at Burger King 1998 by Djf47021
Could've been worse. They could've been greasy and sticky.
ElectricPeterTork t1_j5pshu3 wrote
Reply to Why do shows still choose to use a laugh track in this day and age? Does ANYONE favour it? by [deleted]
Hey, it's today's "LAFF TRACK BAAAAADDDDDDD" thread.
Funny thing is, it's the sitcoms with laugh tracks or live studio audiences people still watch and remember. So I don't think it's as much an issue outside of the small internet bubble as you'd think by seeing the regular laff track bad posts here.
ElectricPeterTork t1_j4na4ug wrote
Reply to comment by Soft_Raisin5384 in Me in 1987 fangirling my heart out at a Sci Fi convention by Soft_Raisin5384
If you ever do it again, build it in front of a door, with no back on it.
ElectricPeterTork t1_j4jh5g2 wrote
'87?
Bad time for Doctor Who, but Star Trek was on the rise again. Then the opposite happened in 2005.
Anyway, must've been some truly dedicated nerds there to have a TARDIS out and about in '87.
ElectricPeterTork t1_j2c2j4v wrote
Reply to comment by jsakic99 in 70's ad... In the comfort of your home! by XaltotunTheUndead
You damn kids today don't know how good you got it with your Xrodents and Crimsontubes and all that, bringing all sorts of filth flarn filth right into your homes and to your phones for free at any second of the day or night. Back in my day, you had to put on your trenchcoat and your hipwader boots (and only your trenchcoat and hipwaders), trudge out to the porno theatre at a set time, pay a seedy looking guy who looked like he'd sodomize you for a half-eaten sandwich for a ticket to a movie you'd only watch 10 minutes of, tops, find a seat equidistant from the other 4 pervs in there, openn your trenchcoat just enough that your cock & balls were breathing the sweet air of freedom but not far enough to remove plausible deniability should the vice cops raid the place, and rub one out at the same time those other 4 pervs were, all the while hoping you'd time it just right so you'd come while there was a flash of titty or some minge onscreen and not a hairy bobbin' man ass.
AND YOU LIKED IT!
ElectricPeterTork t1_j2apwjj wrote
Reply to comment by reclusive_ent in Night Court, 1980s, actor Harry Anderson by just_sayi
Dan was also a sleazy asshole no one liked who probably alienated everyone who would bump him up the ladder.
They probably took great pleasure in seeing him stuck in the same job for 30+ years.
ElectricPeterTork t1_j25t2sw wrote
Reply to comment by Substantial_Act3036 in Brigitte Bardot in the early 1960s starting the trend of topless sunbathing by afrodite11
>Please stop making every post “the first” or “introducing” an idea. It makes the subject look phony and the poster look like an idiot.
The quoted text is the first post ever introducing the idea of not making every post “the first” or “introducing” an idea.
ElectricPeterTork t1_j22apze wrote
Reply to comment by MulciberTenebras in Stan Lee, 1987. Today is his 100th birthday by BlackMoldComics
Yes, it was Stan The Man and Jack "King" Kirby.
Also, Jazzy John Romita, Big John Buscema, Roy "The Boy" Thomas, and Vince "Eraser" Colettta.
Well, not that last one, but if you've ever seen the befores and afters of pages he inked, you'll get it.
ElectricPeterTork t1_j1y71y4 wrote
Reply to Goldie Hawn having body paint applied on the set of 'Rowan and Martin's Laugh-In', 1968 by BarkyMcBarkinHeimer
sigh
An outfit that was appropriate for primetime network TV 55 years ago is now NSFW.
Good thing we can't see her ankles or this place'd get raided.
ElectricPeterTork t1_j1y6h72 wrote
Reply to is there any show with more spin-offs and spin-offs-of-spin-offs than All in the Family? by [deleted]
Law and Order, Happy Days, Star Trek, Walking Dead is getting there...
ElectricPeterTork t1_j1xrpnm wrote
Reply to comment by HRJafael in A lot of unaired TV pilots have surfaced today on Internet Archive by HRJafael
A quick google shows it was Shonda Rhimes does Downton in the US starring Captain Jack Harkness.
Julian Fellowes wasn't involved, so it wasn't the actual Downton prequel that morphed into The Gilded Age.
ElectricPeterTork t1_jef2t45 wrote
Reply to Seriously enjoyed the first episode of "The Power" on Amazon Prime. The series is based on a 2017 novel about how the world radically changes when millions of teenage girls suddenly develop electrical superpowers. Notably, none of them put on costumes and start fighting crime. by TJ_Fox
Well obviously, some would. They're just not the focus of the story.