Germany's power production is 55% fossil fuel, 13% nuclear, 35% renewable. Their power use is 51% fossil fuel, 13% nuclear and 38% renewable and 5% imports. Renewable in this case is 6% solar and 12% wind, 10% biomass reactors, and about 5% hydroelectric dams. Minor production from geothermal and kinetic power.

Even the most generous sources put germany's power production and use at 45% renewable.

Did you actually look at the source you listed? The very next article explains why 80,000 years is wrong.

>but rather it is tied to a people through religion, culture, hunting, etc.

That's quite literally how every nation works. It's not some unique thing. Every nation has religious, cultural and resource tied to its land. Trying to claim this is an aboriginal idea is both racist, see the noble savage trope, and ignorant of European history and development.

>we’d all think it racist and wrong if Japan, South Korea, Iceland, or most any other country said that their borders are solely for people of one ethnic heritage?

A few nations, including Japan, do this. The only place where it is called racist is the US but only if it's white people.

No it hasn't. The oldest signs of aboriginals in Australia only date to 47,000 years ago. Also, aboriginal Australians aren't a single nation, it is extremely unlikely that a single member nation has owned any piece of land for more than a thousand years. Next you will be arguing we should give Algeria back to the vandals.

I can't tell if this is a joke, but the third member of a poly relationship is sometimes called a unicorn, and an undue amount of r/polyamory is about discussing unicorns. That's probably what they meant based on the structure of the comment.