DollyPartWithOn
DollyPartWithOn t1_jdswrib wrote
Reply to President Biden's nominee to head the FAA has withdrawn after Republican criticism by Panaka
The GOP, who confirms lawyers who have never argued in court as federal judges, feels a man who was CEO for Denver Airport for two years is unqualified to head the FAA.
DollyPartWithOn t1_j93iik4 wrote
So, how do we stop these insidious chlorophyllian invaders? Blow up the mountains?
DollyPartWithOn t1_j7pjwn2 wrote
Reply to Harry Whittington, the Texas attorney shot by Cheney during a 2006 hunting trip, dies by DysonDragon11
Cheney's bullet finally killed him, only 17 years later!
DollyPartWithOn t1_j2zqyb3 wrote
Reply to comment by Feeling_Glonky69 in The study concluded that post-COVID-19 syndrome was detected in 25% of the included participants. COVID-19 hospitalization, initial symptomatic COVID-19, and female sex were significant risk factors for developing post-COVID-19 syndrome. by bo_hossuin_14
Nice. Very passive aggressive.
Why do you think I look at FB? I don't think you understand the point I'm making at all.
In most many many fields of science, experiments are never done again to replicate findings. And many times the findings fail to be replicated when it is actually done, sometimes because the same protocol was not followed. And sometimes studies are never replicated but are still taken as fact by governments and institutions.
So, my point is this: why do this survey study when it's been done many, many times with similar findings when it's so trivial (and a waste of resources in my opinion) and when there's a lot more studies that need replication to actually help the people being affected.
DollyPartWithOn t1_j2zls92 wrote
Reply to comment by Elanapoeia in The study concluded that post-COVID-19 syndrome was detected in 25% of the included participants. COVID-19 hospitalization, initial symptomatic COVID-19, and female sex were significant risk factors for developing post-COVID-19 syndrome. by bo_hossuin_14
I don't understand the unfriendly attitude here or the assumption that I don't like science. If you knew the history of the NIH and CDC, then you'd understand.
DollyPartWithOn t1_j2zk14q wrote
Reply to comment by zaiyonmal in The study concluded that post-COVID-19 syndrome was detected in 25% of the included participants. COVID-19 hospitalization, initial symptomatic COVID-19, and female sex were significant risk factors for developing post-COVID-19 syndrome. by bo_hossuin_14
Whatdya mean? Of course, I do. Scientists have to do similar survey studies to replicate findings even if the same findings have already been found 20 or more times so they can get paid from their universities or governments.
DollyPartWithOn t1_j2xd9lv wrote
Reply to comment by SueSudio in The study concluded that post-COVID-19 syndrome was detected in 25% of the included participants. COVID-19 hospitalization, initial symptomatic COVID-19, and female sex were significant risk factors for developing post-COVID-19 syndrome. by bo_hossuin_14
Soon, the NIH will have its groundbreaking study showing Long Covid affects 23-25% of the population, affects mostly women, and those with symptoms.
DollyPartWithOn t1_j2x3r2k wrote
Reply to The study concluded that post-COVID-19 syndrome was detected in 25% of the included participants. COVID-19 hospitalization, initial symptomatic COVID-19, and female sex were significant risk factors for developing post-COVID-19 syndrome. by bo_hossuin_14
Great. Another survey study showing the same thing as every other study.
DollyPartWithOn t1_j1enpo6 wrote
Reply to Despite improvements in insulin formulations and delivery over the last 30 years, diabetes control has not improved among US adults, and disparities for minority and uninsured adults worsens by Ordinarymangodoctor
You need added sugar and junk food taxes so people consume less of these things. Even pure sugar and white flour should get taxed. Meanwhile, healthy snacks like veggies, fruit, popcorn, diet soda, and carbonated water can all receive subsidies along with whole grain bread and artificial sweeteners.
DollyPartWithOn t1_jdt2tri wrote
Reply to comment by Power_Broker2 in President Biden's nominee to head the FAA has withdrawn after Republican criticism by Panaka
Sure. He looks bad. And the fact that he was nominated mid last year and he seemed to not know some basic questions is concerning. Though, at least one of those questions seemed a bit ridiculous.
Edit: The senator knows the answers to the questions he's asking because he's asking them. Did he really have these things memorized before he and his staff prepared the questions? To ask what some section #'s of the FAA bylaws are seems a bit ridiculous to ask to me. It is not like it's a Supreme Court hearing where there are only 28 amendments.