Digital_loop
Digital_loop t1_iuccebd wrote
Is that a tailings pond or an actual safe to swim in pond?
Digital_loop t1_itx4mzb wrote
Reply to comment by Machder in Merck pays Moderna $250m for personalized cancer vaccine by tonymmorley
No, I won't do my own research. I want you to explain what it is you are talking about. I also want you to provide me with a lot more than "do your own research".
You clearly have done the research, why am I now having to go find the same stuff but you won't tell me where it is?
Digital_loop t1_itvpwiw wrote
Reply to comment by Machder in Merck pays Moderna $250m for personalized cancer vaccine by tonymmorley
Please, go on. I want to hear this story!
Digital_loop t1_itmvaf3 wrote
Holy shit, a talking cat!
Digital_loop t1_ir2vy8k wrote
Reply to See lifelike facial reconstructions of a medieval Scottish woman, priest and bishop by unheated1
"reconstructions"... Like we could ever truly know what they looked like anyway!
Digital_loop t1_iugqc5y wrote
Reply to comment by bradland in LPT: If you only want scientific research-based answers when Googling a health question, add the word "pubmed" by dizzydes
Further to your point... Not all studies are very good and many are published despite being junk.
Take this one for example.
Randomized Controlled Trial
Greenselect Phytosome as an adjunct to a low-calorie diet for treatment of obesity: a clinical trial
I won't post the link because I don't want to risk breaking any rules, but google that title to have it pop at the top.
It's terrible. They had minimal participants with no verifiable data retrieved from it. Further, it has not been duplicated!