Digital_loop

Digital_loop t1_iz2rkbk wrote

Reply to comment by ShittyBeatlesFCPres in Google says they have made a significant advance in allowing humans to communicate with robots using natural language, and claim an "order of magnitude" increase in capabilities over previous approaches. by lughnasadh

I agree and disagree with you and the previous poster!

I agree because we have people all the time who can't use a debit machine... It's not like the tech is new, we've had it since roughly the mid 70's!

And cell phones? We've been using them in the mass market since the late 90's early 2000's!

3

Digital_loop t1_iydq21g wrote

Reply to 2nd job at 18, worth it? by RoyalHaza

There is a lot of good advice here but there is one piece everyone has missed...

90% of binging successful is just showing up.

What that means is, you show up to work ready to tackle the day. You do all the jobs. This will let you get expirience in areas that you don't have yet.

Don't let the odd jobs at work become your actual work though, there is a balance. Once in a while, sure, mop the floor. But if it's every day then you need to talk to your boss about it.

1

Digital_loop t1_iuox8nl wrote

Reply to comment by yada_yadad_sex in New RSV vaccines are on track to make this one of the last bad cold seasons by Man-from-Hjelmdall

I've explained it to people like this.

If you have 100 really smart people working on 100 different things and it takes 1 year for all 100 things to get developed... Imagine how quickly everything could be done if all 100 people focused on just 1 thing!

Thats what happened with the covid vaccines. We took the world's smarted people away from all of the other projects and set them to a singular problem to solve. Of course we developed a vaccine in less than a year!

9

Digital_loop t1_iugqc5y wrote

Reply to comment by bradland in LPT: If you only want scientific research-based answers when Googling a health question, add the word "pubmed" by dizzydes

Further to your point... Not all studies are very good and many are published despite being junk.

Take this one for example.

Randomized Controlled Trial

Greenselect Phytosome as an adjunct to a low-calorie diet for treatment of obesity: a clinical trial

I won't post the link because I don't want to risk breaking any rules, but google that title to have it pop at the top.

It's terrible. They had minimal participants with no verifiable data retrieved from it. Further, it has not been duplicated!

3