The only problem we can be certain of is the lack of transparency. Regardless of which direction or how strong the bias is, they should always be transparent about how it works.

Obviously they did. People made everything about it. The question is to what extent they did it deliberately.

Does any group truly need protection from words any more or less than any other group?

Of course it is biased. It's just a reflection of the culture that created it.

It won't happen, and even if it did, it won't work.

Just like any other new technology, it will be reserved for elites until the cost comes down to the point that normal people can afford it. If it becomes incredibly powerful, it's likely the elites will try to prevent it from leaking out to the public. But once it does get leaked, the genie can't be put back into the bottle. At that point, every authoritarian country will start shooting themselves in the foot by desperately banning it.

Not anytime soon. Some things can't be cured, they can only be treated.

Why would you link this paywall clickbait trash

NOOOO you're going to shut off the universe!

I don't see how they haven't already. Alphabet is much more valuable to the world. Everyone i know uses Google products/services every day, but only a few people i know use apple products. I see Google as a necessity and Apple as a luxury.

Damn, just wait until they hear about Photoshop.

It's not developing slowly, you're just being impatient. If you really think the problems are that easy to solve quickly then you should be solving them yourself.

"brain machine interface" just sounds like a fancy way of saying screen.