DadBodofanAmerican

DadBodofanAmerican t1_j7z2st4 wrote

Sure, or come up with a reasonable per-foot of frontage rate that can be paid annually. But figuring out a new tax valuation seems a bit silly when the city will see benefits from increased economic activity, foot traffic, and payroll taxes. These spots were just going to be used to warehouse cars anyway.

−2

DadBodofanAmerican t1_j6bohj9 wrote

Most of the students in the security alerts are out own towner morons who think it's fine to video chat on your iphone while strolling through the Bronx at whatever hour. Not saying they deserve it, but it's pretty fucking stupid for a student at a pretty decent school.

2

DadBodofanAmerican t1_j33l6cq wrote

societal decay.

It's a lack of education because people think they're gonna win. A lack of activities because people don't have anything else to do but go and lose money amidst faux luxury and flashing lights. And the casinos market hard towards the exact sort of poor, uneducated people who can't afford to go there.

1

DadBodofanAmerican t1_j1d3mvx wrote

Most either split an apartment in Albany with another legislator (dirt cheap, less than 2k a month for a smaller 2 bedroom that's walking distance to their offices) or stay in hotels. They can use their campaign funds to pay for the hotels or use their per diem (that's right the state pays them extra to travel to Albany already) of $183 a night. That pays for a pretty nice hotel in Albany, or some of them stay at the shitty days in by the airport for $60 a night and pocket the rest.

11

DadBodofanAmerican t1_j0lyt00 wrote

If the city wanted to ban the production of Foie Gras inside NYC then they are more than welcome to. They didn't. They banned the sale at restaurants. The farmers that this hurts aren't city residents so they have no voice in the process. But they are state residents so Albany stepped in to protect them.

2

DadBodofanAmerican t1_j0lxlxi wrote

Nope. Overreach by the city. The state agricultural law prohibits any municipality from passing laws that will adversely affect the agricultural industry of another municipality. This way the state government, with representatives from both areas, can come in and make a decision where both areas have an equal say.

2

DadBodofanAmerican t1_iu8exfc wrote

> Instead of parking lots, we'd get five- to six-story apartment buildings, with reduced space for cars, next to busy LIRR or Metro-North stations. It's a win-win—not only would it help address the state's yawning housing gaps, but also, our climate problem. Suburban sprawl's link to car dependency—a key contributor of carbon emissions—is well known. Want to drive your car less? Live closer to reliable transit.

This is pretty short sighted. Reduced parking at LIRR will just disincentive people who live outside of walking distance from taking the train. And the people who do move close to express stops (nobody is gonna bump development on local stops) will still need cars to access the rest of long island for food, entertainment, schools, etc; because the whole system is designed to exclusively bring workers to jobs then back.

24