DID_IT_FOR_YOU
DID_IT_FOR_YOU t1_jdzoad2 wrote
Reply to comment by DaHolk in Woman framed in ‘rape fantasy’ plot speaks out after conviction of ex-U.S. Marshal by drkgodess
Unfortunately in this case framing someone carries a lighter sentence vs hiring men to sexually assault someone.
As for why law enforcement get treated differently? Does it even need to be said?
DID_IT_FOR_YOU t1_j6k06l8 wrote
Reply to comment by steviaplath153 in OpenAI executives say releasing ChatGPT for public use was a last resort after running into multiple hurdles — and they're shocked by its popularity by steviaplath153
Wow you’re such an idiot. Pressed a button? You think Artificial intelligence isn’t an extremely difficult, expensive and bleeding edge technology?
You have no idea how much expertise, investment, time, manpower, etc goes into developing something like CHATGPT. If it was so easy there would be thousands of AI chatbots all over the place and nobody would care about ChatGPT.
Also any data it’s accessed on the web was posted there publicly. Anyone can easily protect their data by using something as simple captcha (that requires human intervention) or a login.
Creating a software that can learn, chat normally, and solve issues for people (such as debugging code) is HARD. It’s bleeding edge tech. It’s also extremely expensive to support as the servers it uses for all its processing, storage, bandwidth, etc don’t come cheap. ChatGPT is costing them tens of millions if not more to run and currently no one has to pay anything to use it.
Everyone already understands that when you get to use an internet service for free it’s because you’re the product instead (your data = the value paid). No one is forcing you to use it.
DID_IT_FOR_YOU t1_j2c5sls wrote
Reply to comment by Insectshelf3 in US appeals court upholds Florida transgender toilet policy by isaaclw
The current SC is currently a 6-3 Christian Theocracy so don’t expect anything. You already had one of the judges laying out their plan to get rid of gay marriage.
DID_IT_FOR_YOU t1_je1pqze wrote
Reply to comment by georgianarannoch in Woman framed in ‘rape fantasy’ plot speaks out after conviction of ex-U.S. Marshal by drkgodess
It wasn’t rape as it was consensual (they were the ones who invited the men and allowed them in). Notice how the article never mentions the “rapist” being arrested, they definitely did everything they could to make sure the police never caught the guy involved so that the police wouldn’t have his testimony exposing them.
What they did was LIE, make a false report, frame and defame the woman.
There was no rape just tons of deceit to ruin someone.
We have no idea of what actually went on. For all we know the guy off Craigslist double checked with them first and made sure they wanted a hoax rape before “starting.” Everything we know about the incident came from known and convicted liars.