Connect_Eye_5470
Connect_Eye_5470 t1_j68oc0u wrote
Reply to In the absence of cosmic radiation, would an object placed in space eventually cool to absolute zero? by IHatrMakingUsernames
The short answer is no. Soace isn't actually 'empty' and the answer has nothing to do with cosmic radiation. It has to do with kinetic energy. Particles will strike your 'object' and impart kinetic energy which will generate 'heat' due to friction basically. 'Barrier' levels are hard to meet. I.E. you need a lot if energy to heat water from 1 degree Celsius to 99 degrees Celsius. You need a lot more to actually make water boil and reach 100.
Connect_Eye_5470 t1_j04q05e wrote
Reply to comment by absrdbrdtrdmagrdIII in What would 2 stars colliding at relativistic speeds do? (1 solar mass, 10% of c) by Party_9001
Don't know the math well enough to say definitively, but my gut says nearly impossible. The gravitational 'turbulence' would seem to guarantee you wouldn't get the spherical compression pattern to create a singularity.
Connect_Eye_5470 t1_j04phze wrote
Reply to What would 2 stars colliding at relativistic speeds do? (1 solar mass, 10% of c) by Party_9001
It would vary pretty widely on at least two factors.
1.) Ratio of relevant mass i.e. a white dwarf flung away from a multi-stellar system runs into a massive O-type Giant star (say 150+ stellar masses). Likely it never actually collides. The incredible difference in their gravitational fields would tend to force the incoming dwarf into a decaying orbit rather than a 'whammo'. Then the massive star would just 'eat' the smaller one.
2.) Angle of the collision. A good example of this is Luna (our moon) vs an asteroid belt or ring formation around a planet. If two stars of approximately equal size hit head on? Yeah whether the 'explosion' destroyed that solar syatem or not the gravitic disruptions would almost certainly either fling off the planetary bodies as rogues or would suck them in and vaporize them.
Connect_Eye_5470 t1_iy9stld wrote
Reply to comment by ronnyhugo in what would be different if we had two moons by Any_Palpitation_3110
Because it never receives any reflected light from Earth, thus from our perpsective it is the 'dark side'.
Connect_Eye_5470 t1_iuezu5y wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in is there such a thing as "Big Boned?" by Dr-Logan
Not always and you know that's true if you just think about it. Have you ever met someone with enormous wrists and hands for their size? The body-type really doesn't matter there.
Connect_Eye_5470 t1_iuezk5j wrote
Reply to is there such a thing as "Big Boned?" by Dr-Logan
The short answer is yes. You've seen it yourself if you think about it. Ever notice an adult with extremely 'fine boned ' hands, wrists, and feet? Then people with a wrist it would take both your hands to wrap around and a fist the size of your skull? There is no real fat or musculature in those areas, thus that IS a difference in skeletal size and density. Now that term is usually just mis-used to describe someone overweight.
Connect_Eye_5470 t1_iqycmj2 wrote
Reply to Why do symptoms of viral illness come on so suddenly days after exposure? by CoveredinCatHairs
The short answer? Viral load. The number of viruses you are initially exposed to matters a LOT to how quickly and how severely your symptoms occur. You just 'caught a whiff' and the viral colony started small. Then it started to breed. Reached 'virulency threshhold' and voila you're 'suddenly' sick as a dog.
Connect_Eye_5470 t1_j68p8wg wrote
Reply to Are there any species of plant that require seasonal temperature drops as part of their life-cycle? by I3P
Basically... all of them. Here is a prime example Soy. Now humans worked on altering Soy so it would mature at a slightly different amount of daylight and whammo Brazil became a massive Soy exporter when prior it couldn't grow Soy in most of the country.