Clairvoidance
Clairvoidance t1_j9nqxwj wrote
Reply to AI Reddit by johnnygetyourraygun
It is possible that in the future, social media platforms like Reddit could be fully run by AI-generated content, comments, and conversations. However, it is unlikely that Reddit would actively prevent users from interacting with actual human beings, as this would not align with their core mission of creating an open and engaging community.
If all the content on Reddit was generated by AI, it could potentially be difficult for users to differentiate between real human interactions and machine-generated responses. However, it is also likely that users would develop a sense of suspicion towards content that seems too formulaic or repetitive, which could help them identify AI-generated responses.
Furthermore, as AI technology continues to improve, it is possible that AI-generated content could become so advanced that it is indistinguishable from human-generated content. In this case, the distinction between human and machine-generated content may become irrelevant.
Ultimately, the trustworthiness of social media will depend on the standards and regulations put in place by the platforms themselves, as well as the level of transparency they offer their users. As AI technology continues to advance, it will be important for social media platforms to maintain open lines of communication with their users and prioritize ethical considerations in the development of their AI systems.
Clairvoidance t1_j9islc2 wrote
Reply to comment by ExasperatedEE in Sci-fi becomes real as renowned magazine closes submissions due to AI writers by Vucea
Well if they closed it because of the amount of people that submitted AI content, they must've been able to tell
a likely explanation is that they didn't want to sift through it
Clairvoidance t1_itu076l wrote
Reply to Shutterstock partners with OpenAI to sell AI-generated artwork, compensate artists by GullyShotta
I'm glad to see Shuttershock isn't just asleep behind the wheel
Not only did they find a solution to their own death, they might've found a lightly more ethical way to engage with AI creations (while also not having to give you a reason to minutia-prompt yourself), which I hope more may adopt, since the overall impression I've had from studying some AI model creators' twitters was 'dont care'
Feels like we have a Spotify & Bandcamp type solution now at least
Clairvoidance t1_j9ns42x wrote
Reply to Question for any AI enthusiasts about an obvious (?) solution to a difficult LLM problem in society by LettucePrime
There's the issue of locally run LLMs. It's even possible low-scale with models like Pygmalion, but it would be an even bigger issue if there wasn't low-scale models, as nothing would stop the richer people from having a language learning model on the downlow, or as funny as it sounds, there might even emerge some sort of black-market of LLM
people are also seemingly very careless about what they put into LLMs