I should have clarified I meant for irl interactions; which will become necessary for anything important thanks to all the digital fakes.

Public speaking will be more important. Not necessarily in front of a crowd. But your ability to speak to others and present will become vital.

No other way to stand out in the world of AI-assisted content creation.

We aren’t tidally locked and have a longer revolutionary period. I imagine that makes a difference in terms of friction/heat.

We see the plasma, but it’s definitely full of gases. Nice try, pedant.

Is tidal heating even material versus latent core heat and radioactive decay?

I propose “Turbo Plastic” as the name.

You sound like a prime advocate for Universal Basic Income. Since you see what’s coming. Even without AGI, it’s coming for many desk jobs now.

When someone posts blatant propaganda; it should be met with facts.

That’s all that happened here. 3D printing is not “advanced manufacturing” for aerospace components.

I'm referring to the use of 3d printing in mass production.

Mass production of modern jet fighters is dozens of units; not millions. 3d printing has been cheaper than tooling for various parts for decades.

I'm not necessarily knocking the Chinese; they are masters at traditional tooling and manufacturing in ways we simply don't have the talent base to replicate. But for the same reasons, we are decades ahead in additive manufacturing and Uncle Sam only knows how far ahead in aerospace technology.

I'm more knocking the headline that 3d printing is new or advanced in the field of aero defense.

>This quotation is usually coupled with a colorful anecdote, but the details of the stories vary greatly. Here is an account from the economics writer Stephen Moore that was printed in the Wall Street Journal in 2009. Moore stated that he used to visit Milton Friedman and his wife, and together they would dine at a favorite Chinese restaurant: [2]

>At one of our dinners, Milton recalled traveling to an Asian country in the 1960s and visiting a worksite where a new canal was being built. He was shocked to see that, instead of modern tractors and earth movers, the workers had shovels. He asked why there were so few machines. The government bureaucrat explained: “You don’t understand. This is a jobs program.” To which Milton replied: “Oh, I thought you were trying to build a canal. If it’s jobs you want, then you should give these workers spoons, not shovels.”

https://quoteinvestigator.com/2011/10/10/spoons-shovels

>Cheap and disposable yes, then just build another. It's a great way to keep your population employed

Labor should be necessary and fulfilling. Not arbitrarily maximized.

The worst part about cheering for a cheap and disposable design is that there is still a pilot in that jet. China might find it's pilot's disposable but America doesn't have the same notion of its' pilots.

Something something “if you want to create jobs, give them spoons, not shovels”

Alternate headline:

China catches up to early 1990s Lockheed Martin manufacturing techniques.

Sane people have taken the vaccine, gotten covid, and understand it’s essentially a new common cold.

Sucks to suck if you are an antivaxxer but covid isn’t a problem for the rest of us now. RSV and immune system “atrophy” are the problems now.

Being a NEET surely requires external factors, including pure privilege— but I think you’d quickly find the number greatly reduced if bagging paid $30/hour.

I like the oscillating fan idea.

Another simple solution would be a little servo just pushing a rod into the ground. You could choose the speed that way using an arduino.

Is it the lack of sufficient spectrum coverage? Certainly Red and Green are commercially viable since they’re hitting TVs.

Does anyone know what primary spectrum of current PVs absorb is? If quantum dots let us focus on high energy blues and violets/ultraviolets then it could be worth it from cell degradation alone. Assuming the quantum dots don’t deteriorate over time. I have no idea, I just assume they’re solid state since they are allegedly better than phosphors.

How old are quantum dots? They seem ripe to replace this. Instead of trying to capture all the spectrum in multiple layers; capture one wavelength efficiently and convert the rest with quantum dots.

They did similar shit with phosphors back in the day.

Glass has been around for a long time; still a miracle material.