CassCat

CassCat OP t1_j6d35q2 wrote

Reply to comment by speel in This is a cult, right? by CassCat

Sorry the sarcasm was lost. My point was that the since the funding comes from a huge hedge fund, it’s kind of shitty to be skimpy with wages

3

CassCat OP t1_j69ihdc wrote

Reply to comment by 1papaya-2papaya in This is a cult, right? by CassCat

And the FAQ clearly states that sporting goods are allowed, but no hard balls “that could break the glass”. I’m guessing that taking the side out of their glass serpentine building would result in not being asked back…

3

CassCat OP t1_j697w8e wrote

Reply to comment by Squaddr in This is a cult, right? by CassCat

Yeah, "they were doing drugs" is kind of an unsatisfying premise for a show which established so much intrigue in the beginning...still enjoyed it.

1

CassCat OP t1_j68w71m wrote

Reply to comment by JuiceyDelicious in This is a cult, right? by CassCat

No need to be nasty. It appears to be a separate entity for zoning and regulatory reasons per the article posted above; appears the original intention was to build a church, but there were concerns that government organizations would be excluded from partnerships d/t separation of church/state-type laws. So I wouldn't be too quick to dismiss it as a recruiting ground for some religious body.

8