Bournvitta2022
Bournvitta2022 t1_iwpp8co wrote
Reply to comment by Kaindlbf in Overhyping hydrogen as a fuel risks endangering net-zero goals by filosoful
Really, cost of EV was also high initially. Also you need to take into account the environmental effect of mining for raw materials in large scale plus recycling is a nightmare for now.
Hydrogen once scalability is achieved it would be cheaper to produce. It's just abt figure out material that can transport hydrogen like piped CNG.
Also for heavy TRUCKs hydrogen makes more sense.
Maybe we can have Battery for cars and hydrogen for industrial use and transportation.
Bournvitta2022 t1_iwpje8n wrote
One more propoganda report gainst hydrogen.
Hydrogen has multiple uses and can easily fit into the current structure of transportation and logistic.
Just read abt EV battery manufacturing and recycling and raw material mining. It's more damaging to environment than hydrogen will ever be.
Hydrogen can actually have countries self sufficient nin their energy needs unlike battery manufacturing (only few countries have lithium reserves).
Renewable energy can be used to produce cheap hydrogen. Making a fuel cell requires less material then batteries.
Bournvitta2022 t1_itbub6b wrote
It won't fails they may have to change approach but virtual/ augmented reality is the future.
Bournvitta2022 t1_itbgqf5 wrote
It's simple hospitals/Pharma want more money. Telemedicine allows doctors and patients to reduce unnecessary expenditure.
Bournvitta2022 t1_iwqmkpt wrote
Reply to comment by bawng in Overhyping hydrogen as a fuel risks endangering net-zero goals by filosoful
Yes but for countries like Japan and india. Hydrogen makes more sense even if expensive as long as cost is lower than IC engine.
Self reliance and also japan has a reactor that produces electricity as well as hydrogen at cheap cost. It's just a prototype but its promising.