BackgroundChemist
BackgroundChemist t1_ixgmjbl wrote
I think pytorch is a good level for understanding what's going on building networks but not knee deep in mathematics and fundamentals.
Even then there are quite a lot of prepackaged networks bundled into pytorch; from what I remember you can just instantiate AlexNet with one line.
BackgroundChemist t1_iu3f3rz wrote
Reply to [D] Do companies actually care about their model's training/inference speed? by GPUaccelerated
The impact of training time is not linear so neither are the benefits of speeding up. For example, going from 1hr to 5 minutes would be useful for experimentation/early development phases. However once I am training a model for Production then 12 hours overnight is fine. I have other things to do to fill the time. I think what is useful for faster training is to be able to see that the model is converging.
Inference time is important up to a point but performance engineering is about steady optimisation over the whole system. You can reach a floor on one part like inference and still have work in network or cpu-bound stages.
BackgroundChemist t1_j23d4gy wrote
Reply to comment by Ok-Perception8269 in [P] We finally got Text-to-PowerPoint working!! (Generative AI for Slides ✨) by Mastersulm
Yes - basic PPT to slick presentation would be really useful, I like writing content but the layout formatting is boring as far as I'm concerned