Atticus_Fatticus t1_ja0dwx0 wrote on February 25, 2023 at 10:15 PM

Reply to comment by GenX_DILLIGAF in LockBit leaks 44GB of Royal Mail's data and sets fresh £33 million ransom by tyw7

Good. Hope these punks get thrown over the side of a boat.

Atticus_Fatticus t1_ja0a0p5 wrote on February 25, 2023 at 9:47 PM

Reply to comment by JiBBy23 in Windows 10 users are being offered a Windows 11 upgrade despite not meeting the requirements by GOR098

If you can open it in safe mode turn off memory integrity. I was having constant BSOD cycle on boot up until I turned that off. Still have not found a solution yet.

Atticus_Fatticus t1_j9y63bq wrote on February 25, 2023 at 12:37 PM

Reply to comment by MacDegger in Even Hackers are reportedly getting Laid Off by Organized Crime Groups by TradingAllIn

That's not my experience with it. It wrote some really solid GDScript for me which I thought was impressive because it's a very specific programming language.

Atticus_Fatticus t1_j9s1gky wrote on February 24, 2023 at 3:35 AM

Reply to Fourth Circuit: Individuals Have a First Amendment Right to Livestream Their Own Traffic Stops by mepper

I'm confused... so is there an official city policy banning livestreaming or no? The article makes it seem like that's some wild mystery when it should be extremely easy to tell whether or not that's true. It should either be a city statute or there's an internal policy which is subject to Freedom of Information Act requests or legal subpoena.

If it's not true, then where the fuck is the recourse? He can't sue the city unless there's an actual city policy banning livestreaming, and he can't sue the cop because of qualified immunity? So did the 4th circuit just rule that cops can pretty much just do whatever the fuck they want and citizens have no recourse unless there's a specific city policy banning their poor behavior? That's insane.