AsanoSokato

AsanoSokato t1_iyb6vcw wrote

In case it are not clear what me are talking about. Why does us decided that the top one are right, while the lower one are wrong.[punctuation sic]

Get it? Yes, we've just gradually agreed on a way to communicate. Math is just language.

2

AsanoSokato t1_iyarzh2 wrote

The premise of the question is flawed. What doctor has said a baby is [https://www.brown.edu/Administration/News_Bureau/2003-04/03-099.html] born addicted to crack? After 16 years of research and more than a decade of following the development of children thought to have been at serious risk, medical experts have not identified a recognizable condition, syndrome or disorder that should merit the label “crack baby.” With no basis in science, the term serves only to stigmatize and slander children and their mothers and should be eliminated from public discourse The Eli5 can be found in [https://pbsnc.pbslearningmedia.org/resource/race-media-and-the-myth-of-the-crack-baby-video/retro-report/">this] this video which teaches "about the tone and content of cultural debates over race and the role of government during the Reagan era." And "presents a case study in how point of view and context can affect the interpretation of historical sources. By understanding how the news media encouraged panic about a national epidemic of disabled 'crack babies'. It shows "the complex factors and motives behind an incorrect account of an event by a primary source."

2