Akiasakias

Akiasakias t1_jad6pn1 wrote

In this case microprocessors?

It's ambiguous because china only makes the very low end chips. They are not a threat to the high end market.

The article does not differentiate. So yeah china makes a lot of chips, but not even the quality to go in a car, more like a toaster. Lots of em, but just the real basic designs.

26

Akiasakias t1_j55qskc wrote

So they determine not only the "truth" but also mind read your intent.

Given the missteps lately of true stories being labeled misinformation, I don't think there could be a good way to administer this policy, it is flawed.

2

Akiasakias t1_j51qn7v wrote

The source is a best selling author and THE dude the industry pays to consult for them and give talks at all the big conferences. I picked a short video just for ease of linking right to it, but his infographics are used the world over.

Also, if you looked at the video, you would see it also praised wind as the solution, although Germany doesn't have the best profile there it is much better than solar. Germany has paid more for solar than California where it makes sense, for way way way less output.

−2

Akiasakias t1_j51ciib wrote

Carbon emissions are way up overall, and were even before the war. Yes they are using more renewables in the mix, but overall the environmental impact of German energy policy has been getting worse.

Peak demand is winter and during the night. Solar is unable to meet those needs so in moving away from oil they have been burning coal instead.

I agree with you that agenda over facts is a problem. I just caution you to re-examine which is which. Here is an expert on the subject explaining the issue of why solar in Germany has not gone well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-LV-D9mKoig

We all want to see the energy grid to go green, but there are right and wrong ways to get it done.

−2

Akiasakias t1_j42ehfv wrote

Will have to circle back Saturday with the data. I'm currently 2000 miles from home. Small town with limited internet and no access to my files.

Best I can do from my snow bunker are resources like this. https://globalsolaratlas.info/map?c=11.523088,8.261719,2

Red or orange, solar is great economic and environmental.

Yellow it is probably break even. Worth doing for environment reasons. But may not be a great investment.

Green or worse you are probably never going to make back the carbon debt of blast furnacing the silicon into panels.

0

Akiasakias t1_j3zdolu wrote

Germany uses Hollywood style accounting to shuffle significant lignite coal power production into its solar ledger. Takes a whole day to switch over when weather changes but they count it all as 100% solar.

Their solar investments have been GREAT for the technology. But it's been pretty shitty for power output.

They have spent more than California and produce a fraction of the power. Why? Simple amount of sunshine.

Solar in Germany is all about feelings and wishes and nothing about math. The earth is not flat.

Put that shit in Spain and import it. Much cheaper, much more efficient.

−51