AdolescenceOfP1

AdolescenceOfP1 OP t1_jdmlmgd wrote

Because of the way the kids might rummage through the closet, I've taken to just folding and putting everything into a single pillow case for the set. Nice and (mostly) tidy. Even stacks, so long as it's folded on the inside.

For identifying when I take them out of the dryer, someone mentioned that the tags have the sizes. I just checked, and the ones I see don't. They just have code numbers.

There's got to be a better way other than buying all bright red for the kids and everything else for us, because that's what I'm close to doing.

2

AdolescenceOfP1 t1_jdi9rhn wrote

That's assembly. Rostov007 was talking about testing. Besides, SpaceX doesn't have a sliver of the government contracts that Boeing does, and certainly less than a sliver of its history. How much of SpaceX are miltary contracts? Boeing does a huge amount.

Anyway, enough of this. Unsubscribing. There's a weird kneejerk positive reaction to SpaceX and similarly weird kneejerk negative reaction to other companies (and NASA) that I'm not willing to engage right now.

Unsubscribing.

−8

AdolescenceOfP1 t1_jdhphjz wrote

>They can’t get anything right so what are they protecting?

Obvious overstatement on that last sentence...I'll not even address that part further.

But as a government (space, defense) contractor, they have to have a default stance regarding IP. How do they know ahead of time what part of any project will be critical to keep secret? They don't.

−3

AdolescenceOfP1 t1_jdhdpyz wrote

> Unnaturally skittish and secretive for a project that is over budget, long-delayed, and rife with issues.

?

Skittish + Secretive has nothing to do with over budget, delayed, and issue ridden. All government contractors are like that, and probably for good reason. I was contracted out to Raytheon and Mitre decades ago, and they're wall-to-wall uptight about who is where. Their default stance is to keep things carefully under wraps....it's how they're trained, and it makes sense given the kinds of things they work on.

1

AdolescenceOfP1 t1_ja3a8zz wrote

Yes, and that's a particularly complicated equation. (Water absorption of CO2 decreases with an increase in water temperature.)

But that doesn't in any way invalidate what happens, so be wary of conservative arguments only quoting part of the equation.

CO2 and Ocean Acidification: Causes, Impacts, Solutions

5

AdolescenceOfP1 t1_j49cwy5 wrote

Place "Time travel" as visited in science fiction on the back burner for a moment. There's a problem already.

So many of these comments throughout reddit are saying we are currently traveling forward in time, or that there is a travel forward that is "faster than normal".

What is, is. In the cases of things aging differently (from speed or gravity), there is no change in forward travel. The state at every time slice has dilated, nothing more.

1