AadamAtomic

AadamAtomic t1_j7ji9ec wrote

>QLED” is a backlit LCD technology

No it's not OLED is self lit, like pixel led lights.... LCD is "liquid crystal display" and needs back light shined onto it.

You are correct that Samsung has something even higher quality than that though, but it won't become standard for 10 years or so. It's not even on the main market yet.

Edit: backlit Screens can't fold and roll up like the new Phones, tablets and TV'S...... THEY ARE NOT BACKLIT BECAUSE THEY CAN DO ALL THESE THINGS.

−10

AadamAtomic t1_j7hkqrx wrote

>All existing iPads and MacBooks are equipped with backlit LCD displays, whereas OLED displays have self-emitting pixels and do not require backlighting, allowing for higher contrast ratio.

Welcome to 2015 Apple.

Edit: here's a cheap Samsung tablet with an AMOLED screen.

AMOLED and OLED have been the standard for a while, and about to move on to QLed...

APPLE only serves you the old crap. It's NEW to YOU.

3

AadamAtomic t1_j6kev0h wrote

>The bank I work for has 49% owned by a single person, guess what, even though he is not a majority stock holder he is considered the owner as he can easily get 2% of other people's votes to go his way.

Sounds like a shit bank where the guy literally cannot leave without destroying them. If he dies, and the engeratance is split up that bank is out of business. Lol

>The amount is not relevant.

Goes on a random tangent about how much some Rando person has in a bank*

0

AadamAtomic t1_j6hjhxe wrote

>Why does it matter how much they have when defining whether they have a financial stake or not?

Because nothing is at stake. It's literally an investment.

If OpenA.I failed miserably, Microsoft would lose practically nothing and forget it ever happened just like their cell phones. Business as usual.

>$10B is also not a negligible amount to Microsoft. On their most recent 10-Q they had about $100B in cash.

My dude.... $100B in cash IS WORTH WAYYYY MORE than credit. This is not the amount of money they have or made. This is simply their Liquidity for throwing at random bullshit like Open.AI.

To Microsoft, it's the equivalent of buying a happy meal from McDonald's. Do you consider that a financial Stake?

−4

AadamAtomic t1_j6hi1n6 wrote

>I'll just leave this here.

That's exactly my point. That's literally pocket lint in the eyes of Microsoft , and you're all calling it a ""financial stake."" Lol

It just goes to show that people have no fucking clue the amount of money these corporations have, because it's literally unfathomable to your human brain.

−8

AadamAtomic t1_j6gwd14 wrote

Let's talk about META's A.i and how you don't own your Instagram photos, shal we?

What if META sells all the art Instagram photos to OpenAI for training, fair and legally?

Everyone is mad at Open A.I for nothing.

Dummies are so blinded by fear and anger they are hurting themselves in confution and attacking progress instead of how data is ethically farmed and sold by other companies.

Attacking openA.I won't help ANYONE. It won't stop Google and Facebook from selling your data.

−8

AadamAtomic t1_j5uz92p wrote

We know what it's made of.....

It's mostly vegetable glycerine which is in most of your food already and perfectly safe for consumption.
We just have never studied the nicotine effects on lungs without all the smoke damage and the saturation of glycerine through the organ tissue.

Vaping is still unhealthy. But it is factually magnitudes better than actual cigarettes that contain,

checks notes*

Litteral Rat Poison.

7

AadamAtomic t1_j5uwxfk wrote

>We don't even know that, if we're considering the long term effects.

You are correct....but WE DO know cigarettes cause cancer amung many other problems.

It can't get much worst, and so far we have no clue if it even does that.

3

AadamAtomic t1_j5tda7h wrote

>The health consequences of vaping are not known. Our results show that inhalation of the vapor generated by a popular brand of e-cigarette causes widespread changes inside the lungs, data that further highlight that these products are not inert.

Basically, we still have no clue how bad it is, we just know it's better than regular cigarettes.

55

AadamAtomic t1_j4pw93m wrote

>Unless Google go back to the good old days when they actually served up good search results

They are already working their own EXTREAMLY powerful A.I for that reason.

ImaGEN asking Google to show you a 3D model of what tiger sharks look like, accompanied by correct photos and information without links.

17

AadamAtomic t1_j27yb70 wrote

>You call Apple users stupid but you haven’t said a single intelligent thing.

Hey dude. I'm not the one who purchased a $1000 phone that only cost $100 to make and has ridiculously expensive proprietary Hardware that is cheaper than sand to manufacture, plus spending 30% more on everything you ever purchase on the appstore.

−2