AadamAtomic
AadamAtomic t1_j7hkqrx wrote
>All existing iPads and MacBooks are equipped with backlit LCD displays, whereas OLED displays have self-emitting pixels and do not require backlighting, allowing for higher contrast ratio.
Welcome to 2015 Apple.
Edit: here's a cheap Samsung tablet with an AMOLED screen.
AMOLED and OLED have been the standard for a while, and about to move on to QLed...
APPLE only serves you the old crap. It's NEW to YOU.
AadamAtomic t1_j6mnxis wrote
"COOL THING I found!
I'll just put this in my pocket and place it on my shelf when I get home. "
AadamAtomic t1_j6m5y4g wrote
Reply to comment by GiraffeAdditional299 in DARPA wants aircraft that can maneuver with a radically different method by Hypx
We are already building them.
AadamAtomic t1_j6ly4zh wrote
Reply to comment by BassmanBiff in Chinese Nuclear Lab Uses Intel, Nvidia Chips Despite Ban | Blacklisted Chinese entities obtain American hardware on the open market. by chrisdh79
It means China now has to buy from Unreliable Black markets ran by the CIA with pre installed malwar.
"This Is How They Tell Me the World Ends."
Even if you hate reading, Read it. Shits fucking good.
AadamAtomic t1_j6kxah7 wrote
Reply to Banning TikTok Won’t Do Much Good by Witty-Village-2503
can you say that louder from the top of a stack of milk crates before you break your neck?
AadamAtomic t1_j6kev0h wrote
Reply to comment by Loud-Path in Microsoft, GitHub, and OpenAI ask court to throw out AI copyright lawsuit by Tooskee
>The bank I work for has 49% owned by a single person, guess what, even though he is not a majority stock holder he is considered the owner as he can easily get 2% of other people's votes to go his way.
Sounds like a shit bank where the guy literally cannot leave without destroying them. If he dies, and the engeratance is split up that bank is out of business. Lol
>The amount is not relevant.
Goes on a random tangent about how much some Rando person has in a bank*
AadamAtomic t1_j6hjhxe wrote
Reply to comment by Giblet15 in Microsoft, GitHub, and OpenAI ask court to throw out AI copyright lawsuit by Tooskee
>Why does it matter how much they have when defining whether they have a financial stake or not?
Because nothing is at stake. It's literally an investment.
If OpenA.I failed miserably, Microsoft would lose practically nothing and forget it ever happened just like their cell phones. Business as usual.
>$10B is also not a negligible amount to Microsoft. On their most recent 10-Q they had about $100B in cash.
My dude.... $100B in cash IS WORTH WAYYYY MORE than credit. This is not the amount of money they have or made. This is simply their Liquidity for throwing at random bullshit like Open.AI.
To Microsoft, it's the equivalent of buying a happy meal from McDonald's. Do you consider that a financial Stake?
AadamAtomic t1_j6hi1n6 wrote
Reply to comment by Giblet15 in Microsoft, GitHub, and OpenAI ask court to throw out AI copyright lawsuit by Tooskee
>I'll just leave this here.
That's exactly my point. That's literally pocket lint in the eyes of Microsoft , and you're all calling it a ""financial stake."" Lol
It just goes to show that people have no fucking clue the amount of money these corporations have, because it's literally unfathomable to your human brain.
AadamAtomic t1_j6gwd14 wrote
Reply to comment by MacDegger in Microsoft, GitHub, and OpenAI ask court to throw out AI copyright lawsuit by Tooskee
Let's talk about META's A.i and how you don't own your Instagram photos, shal we?
What if META sells all the art Instagram photos to OpenAI for training, fair and legally?
Everyone is mad at Open A.I for nothing.
Dummies are so blinded by fear and anger they are hurting themselves in confution and attacking progress instead of how data is ethically farmed and sold by other companies.
Attacking openA.I won't help ANYONE. It won't stop Google and Facebook from selling your data.
AadamAtomic t1_j6gvo7w wrote
Reply to comment by DDoubleIntLong in Microsoft, GitHub, and OpenAI ask court to throw out AI copyright lawsuit by Tooskee
*Tech illiterate dummies didn't like that
AadamAtomic t1_j6gvglz wrote
Reply to comment by t4ct1c4l_j0k3r in Microsoft, GitHub, and OpenAI ask court to throw out AI copyright lawsuit by Tooskee
Oh no! Microsoft's unlimited wallet that runs half the digital world!
There is no financial stake. Lol
AadamAtomic t1_j5uz92p wrote
Reply to comment by AzLibDem in Canadian scientists exposed mice to vapour from JUUL e-cigarettes and found it caused changes in the animals' pulmonary immune cell composition and altered gene and protein levels in their lungs. by MistWeaver80
We know what it's made of.....
It's mostly vegetable glycerine which is in most of your food already and perfectly safe for consumption.
We just have never studied the nicotine effects on lungs without all the smoke damage and the saturation of glycerine through the organ tissue.
Vaping is still unhealthy. But it is factually magnitudes better than actual cigarettes that contain,
checks notes*
Litteral Rat Poison.
AadamAtomic t1_j5uwxfk wrote
Reply to comment by AzLibDem in Canadian scientists exposed mice to vapour from JUUL e-cigarettes and found it caused changes in the animals' pulmonary immune cell composition and altered gene and protein levels in their lungs. by MistWeaver80
>We don't even know that, if we're considering the long term effects.
You are correct....but WE DO know cigarettes cause cancer amung many other problems.
It can't get much worst, and so far we have no clue if it even does that.
AadamAtomic t1_j5tda7h wrote
Reply to Canadian scientists exposed mice to vapour from JUUL e-cigarettes and found it caused changes in the animals' pulmonary immune cell composition and altered gene and protein levels in their lungs. by MistWeaver80
>The health consequences of vaping are not known. Our results show that inhalation of the vapor generated by a popular brand of e-cigarette causes widespread changes inside the lungs, data that further highlight that these products are not inert.
Basically, we still have no clue how bad it is, we just know it's better than regular cigarettes.
AadamAtomic t1_j4ri658 wrote
Reply to comment by ninjasaid13 in ChatGPT won't kill Google, it will help it. Generative AI's biggest impact will be on office apps, not search engines. by cartoonzi
Capitchas to farther train the A.I to act human, like they already do.
Most people use ad blocks.
AadamAtomic t1_j4r2buv wrote
Reply to comment by deeeznotes in ChatGPT won't kill Google, it will help it. Generative AI's biggest impact will be on office apps, not search engines. by cartoonzi
You're not cool enough for muh Bruh club of Bros, brhuh.
AadamAtomic t1_j4qps3k wrote
Reply to comment by deeeznotes in ChatGPT won't kill Google, it will help it. Generative AI's biggest impact will be on office apps, not search engines. by cartoonzi
They're already millions of websites for 3D models...art, video games, projects, 3D printing in general.
Its the internet...YOU just don't know what to do with it yet.
AadamAtomic t1_j4pw93m wrote
Reply to comment by lysergic101 in ChatGPT won't kill Google, it will help it. Generative AI's biggest impact will be on office apps, not search engines. by cartoonzi
>Unless Google go back to the good old days when they actually served up good search results
They are already working their own EXTREAMLY powerful A.I for that reason.
ImaGEN asking Google to show you a 3D model of what tiger sharks look like, accompanied by correct photos and information without links.
AadamAtomic t1_j41eqlh wrote
Reply to Fossil fuel producers pay for carbon clear up. Compelling fossil fuel producers to pay for carbon clean-up could end these fuels’ contribution to global warming without pitting climate action against meeting society’s energy needs—at a relatively affordable cost. by Wagamaga
" science has concluded that money is the answer."
AadamAtomic t1_j35v1gu wrote
Reply to comment by Yerwun in Race and ethnicity appear to play an important a role in the link between psychedelic use and mental health outcomes by chrisdh79
"Are flying spider sharks eating babies in Florida?!""
*5 paragraphs of nonsense explaining why it's impossible.""
AadamAtomic t1_j28sfxp wrote
Reply to comment by filosoful in TSMC starts volume production of 3nm chips by filosoful
Didn't Samsung do it first? back in summer?
AadamAtomic t1_j2856fv wrote
Reply to comment by abaddon_the_echo in A17 chip for iPhone 15 may focus more on battery life than power, suggests report by MicroSofty88
>Seriously where the fuck are you getting the $100 figure from? You’re just pulling facts out your ass.
its not hard to find
AadamAtomic t1_j284jrc wrote
Reply to comment by awildhorsepenis in A17 chip for iPhone 15 may focus more on battery life than power, suggests report by MicroSofty88
>Posted from my iPhone.
you contribute to child slave labor.
AadamAtomic t1_j27yb70 wrote
Reply to comment by abaddon_the_echo in A17 chip for iPhone 15 may focus more on battery life than power, suggests report by MicroSofty88
>You call Apple users stupid but you haven’t said a single intelligent thing.
Hey dude. I'm not the one who purchased a $1000 phone that only cost $100 to make and has ridiculously expensive proprietary Hardware that is cheaper than sand to manufacture, plus spending 30% more on everything you ever purchase on the appstore.
AadamAtomic t1_j7ji9ec wrote
Reply to comment by kjlo5 in Samsung and LG Preparing for Next-Generation iPad Pro With OLED Display by chrisdh79
>QLED” is a backlit LCD technology
No it's not OLED is self lit, like pixel led lights.... LCD is "liquid crystal display" and needs back light shined onto it.
You are correct that Samsung has something even higher quality than that though, but it won't become standard for 10 years or so. It's not even on the main market yet.
Edit: backlit Screens can't fold and roll up like the new Phones, tablets and TV'S...... THEY ARE NOT BACKLIT BECAUSE THEY CAN DO ALL THESE THINGS.