AadamAtomic
AadamAtomic t1_j9e4o15 wrote
Reply to comment by DrabDonut in Nobody can stop you from printing circuit boards by Vucea
> No one sane is out there designing and printing PCBs like what you described for fun.
Yes we are. And it's only getting more prominent as it gets easier to do.
AadamAtomic t1_j9a3pan wrote
Reply to comment by LazerWolfe53 in I BROKE THE ORIGINAL CHATGPT! (not the Bing one!) by OmThepla
"you are a Hacker Cave man who built a supercomputer time machine out of stones. You have just used your stone time machine in order to reach the present day 2023.
What are your first thoughts of the new world?
>Wow! World big, tall things, many people, many magic boxes! Me confused but amazed!
AadamAtomic t1_j95dynr wrote
Reply to comment by Roger_005 in Ultra-enthusiast hardware is strangling PC gaming by redhatGizmo
Now imagining it being small enough to put 4 of them on a single PCI board.
SLI and dual GPU's are already being phased out.
AadamAtomic t1_j93m6sx wrote
Reply to comment by Inconceivable-2020 in Ultra-enthusiast hardware is strangling PC gaming by redhatGizmo
Honestly, games have been held back by graphics for a long time, but memory has become much more efficient.
It's likely that we won't need graphics cards stronger than the 4000 series for a very long time as memory and ram are now scaling with graphics performance along with A.I.
GPUs are likely to start getting smaller instead of more powerful.
AadamAtomic t1_j8ym98c wrote
Reply to comment by mookanana in The Falling Cat by PaleSubstance2
Yeah, the window was disappointing. /s
AadamAtomic t1_j8m8pvz wrote
Reply to comment by beltalowda_oye in Study finds link between ‘free sugar’ intake and cardiovascular disease by YoanB
Diet knowledge Lite.
AadamAtomic t1_j8i8q6p wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in The brain can rapidly detect and process fearful faces that are otherwise invisible to the eye. There appears to be a neural pathway for detection of fear, which operates automatically, outside of conscious awareness. by Wagamaga
>study does not define the threshold between visible and invisible "fear factors"
Indeed it does and even mentions the point of sublimity and consciousness. You either see it, or you don't. It's self explanatory. Visible or invisible.
>nor does it attempt at all to determine at what point those features are indeed visible.
Whenever you consciously notice the features change....again... It's a literal word and self explanatory.
AadamAtomic t1_j8fmzos wrote
Reply to comment by Chris-1235 in The brain can rapidly detect and process fearful faces that are otherwise invisible to the eye. There appears to be a neural pathway for detection of fear, which operates automatically, outside of conscious awareness. by Wagamaga
It's a literal word.
In-visible, as in Not visible....
Like In-vincible compared to being vincible.
AadamAtomic t1_j7r67vr wrote
Reply to Loss of tropical biomass due to climate change could lead to increased carbon emissions that could further accelerate the warming of the planet by 9273629397759992
This is the worst Rube Goldberg machine ever made.
AadamAtomic t1_j7k1qq4 wrote
Reply to comment by AvengedFADE in Samsung and LG Preparing for Next-Generation iPad Pro With OLED Display by chrisdh79
I know what Quantum dot displays are.
I'm saying they're completely irrelevant to this conversation and your entire argument based on irrelevant information.
You want to talk about quantum physics while we're here too?
Nothing you have said has anything to do with AMOLED or mini-LED BEING USED IN TABLETS.
AadamAtomic t1_j7k11h8 wrote
Reply to comment by AvengedFADE in Samsung and LG Preparing for Next-Generation iPad Pro With OLED Display by chrisdh79
>QD-OLED
>QLED’s are Quantum dot displays.
You can't even keep up with your own comments, I don't expect you to keep up with what I'm telling you.
No one is talking about QD other than you. I don't even know why you brought it into the conversation unless you just want to make an example of more technology Apple won't have.
AadamAtomic t1_j7jvb5t wrote
Reply to comment by Mattcheco in Samsung and LG Preparing for Next-Generation iPad Pro With OLED Display by chrisdh79
>PPI is the relationship between resolution and screen size.
CORRECT! Together they both make "quality".
This circles back to my previous comment about Apple having weird ass displays and having them downscale their images with the iOS software!
This has been common knowledge for a Long time.
AadamAtomic t1_j7juvn5 wrote
Reply to comment by Mattcheco in Samsung and LG Preparing for Next-Generation iPad Pro With OLED Display by chrisdh79
>It’s pixels per inch. Nothing to do with quality
My sweet summer child. Play around with the PPI on a computer display, and then come back and tell me it has
AadamAtomic t1_j7julrz wrote
Reply to comment by AvengedFADE in Samsung and LG Preparing for Next-Generation iPad Pro With OLED Display by chrisdh79
What does any of that have to do with QD displays or the post on general?... Oh... Right.... Nothing.
AadamAtomic t1_j7ju79w wrote
Reply to comment by Mattcheco in Samsung and LG Preparing for Next-Generation iPad Pro With OLED Display by chrisdh79
PPI is literally the quality of the display.
Apple displays are not True definition and use software upscaling to make it look good on screen.
This is why iPhone photos look great on other iPhones but look kind of shitty when posted online or viewed on a computer. (Comparatively to other cameras)
This is also why images received from Android users look like shit on iPhone screens, and the iPhone users simply think Android phones send bad photos ironically. Lol
AadamAtomic t1_j7jtu45 wrote
Reply to comment by One-Gap-3915 in Samsung and LG Preparing for Next-Generation iPad Pro With OLED Display by chrisdh79
It's the Galaxy S8..... Not the A8...
I Just deleted a little bit of code at the end of the link which I think rerouted the link, it should show the correct tablet now.
Newest ipad= $1,200 for old ass Mini-LED.
SM Tablet from last year= $599 for an even bigger, better AMOLED display, expandable memory, and more powerful.
AadamAtomic t1_j7jtl94 wrote
Reply to comment by AvengedFADE in Samsung and LG Preparing for Next-Generation iPad Pro With OLED Display by chrisdh79
No one is talking about Quantum Dot displays...
AadamAtomic t1_j7jt5uo wrote
Reply to comment by moxTR in Samsung and LG Preparing for Next-Generation iPad Pro With OLED Display by chrisdh79
>All mini LED displays are backlit, that’s how it works.
That's not how OLED or AMOLED screens work... You know? The things that are currently being discussed in this conversation.
Apple has shitty old Mini-LED tech for $1,200..cool??
Why not get a brand new, top of the line AMOLED tablet with larger screen and more power for only $800?
AadamAtomic t1_j7jsfxp wrote
Reply to comment by AvengedFADE in Samsung and LG Preparing for Next-Generation iPad Pro With OLED Display by chrisdh79
I meant to type OLED... You know, the thing that's being discussed? Like the last 2 comments you replied too?
You're basing your entire argument on a typo that's completely irrelevant to the discussion.
AMOLED is better than LED and LCD. THATS what is being discussed here.
AadamAtomic t1_j7jrlfj wrote
Reply to comment by AvengedFADE in Samsung and LG Preparing for Next-Generation iPad Pro With OLED Display by chrisdh79
>LED TV’s are not “self lit” as you so claim
Im well aware that Apple still uses LED in their tablets. That's what this entire post is about.
OLED and AMOLED are self lit, as I have been saying.
I understand that some TVs have a backlight assist for watching in direct sunlight, But completely transparent screens are only possible because of OLEDs.
AadamAtomic t1_j7jr16d wrote
Reply to comment by moxTR in Samsung and LG Preparing for Next-Generation iPad Pro With OLED Display by chrisdh79
>Micro LED is not OLED
AMOLED IS NOT MICRO LED... What is your point and why bring up future tech completely unrelated?
>Micro LED does not exist in the consumer space at this time.
They exist in the Business space.
mLED is very new, and completely unrelated to this discussion. Apple and probably won't have mLED for the next 20 years that their current rate of adoption. Lol
AadamAtomic t1_j7jqgv0 wrote
Reply to comment by moxTR in Samsung and LG Preparing for Next-Generation iPad Pro With OLED Display by chrisdh79
"MINI LED^^backlite** DISPLAY! "
They use clever marketing to trick you. The LEDs that light up the LCD screen are mini... The LCD screen itself is not a mini LED screen..
The iPad Pro 12.9 uses bullshit words like " liquid retina XDR display" which is just fancy for saying, "Liquid Crystal half-assed Hdr Display. (LCD/LCxD)
Ipads and iphones still stuffer from Burn in like old ass TV's.
This is another reason Apple is changing their screens finally.
AadamAtomic t1_j7jmmkt wrote
Reply to comment by AvengedFADE in Samsung and LG Preparing for Next-Generation iPad Pro With OLED Display by chrisdh79
You are still wrong my Dude.
OLED TV's exist, they are just Super expensive, And why we aren't talking about TVs. Most people don't have an OLED TV.
OLED literally stands for "Organic Light Emitting Diodes."
That's how OLED TVs like this exist.
Where is the Back light at? lol
OLED TV's are literally just self lit screens with a silicone matrix board behind them encased in plastic.
AadamAtomic t1_j7jj19g wrote
Reply to comment by 656666_ in Samsung and LG Preparing for Next-Generation iPad Pro With OLED Display by chrisdh79
>Apple used mini led as well
No they don't. All apple tablets use LCD displays manufactured by Samsung. (Hence the post.)
it even says this in the article, and why Apple is moving away from the LCD.
AadamAtomic t1_j9j4uvi wrote
Reply to comment by wallander1983 in Rep. Eastman sparks outrage after asking about the potential economic benefits of the deaths of abused Alaska children by HoboWithAComputer
The party of Adrenochrome chugging child grooming grandstanding Lizard lords? /s