5m0k37r3353v3ryd4y

5m0k37r3353v3ryd4y t1_j8v89kd wrote

Agreed.

But again, to be fair, in your example, we already know the answer to 2 + 2, those unfamiliar with irrational numbers might not know when to expect a rad sign with a negative integer in a response.

So, having a ballpark is good, but if you truly don’t know what type of answer to expect, Google can still be your friend.

3

5m0k37r3353v3ryd4y t1_j8v3sal wrote

If we knew what answers we should be getting, why would we ask the question, though?

To your analogy, I don’t plug numbers into a calculator because I already know the answer I’m gonna get.

I think the move is just to fact check the AI if the correctness of the answer is so important, right? At least while it’s in Beta.

It’s very clear about it’s limitations right up front.

7