1wiseguy
1wiseguy t1_ja1v48w wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Signal CEO: We “1,000% won’t participate” in UK law to weaken encryption by ActivePersona
If authorities want access (to communications), and the messages are not securely encrypted, they will find a way.
It's not difficult to encrypt data such that others will not find a way. But sometimes people don't.
1wiseguy t1_ja1uvc9 wrote
Reply to comment by Sharknado4President in Signal CEO: We “1,000% won’t participate” in UK law to weaken encryption by ActivePersona
The UK government is a vague organization.
Do you know who that is? Can you trust them with your information? Would you send them a copy of every message that you send anybody?
No, no, and no.
1wiseguy t1_j9xjauw wrote
Reply to comment by Sigg3net in Signal CEO: We “1,000% won’t participate” in UK law to weaken encryption by ActivePersona
The military uses encryption that follows the same rules as other encryption.
They are generally more careful to make sure their crypto systems are secure. In theory.
The German military had a really good crypto system in WW2, and it was broken partly because humans made mistakes.
1wiseguy t1_j9xiysd wrote
Reply to comment by hodor137 in Signal CEO: We “1,000% won’t participate” in UK law to weaken encryption by ActivePersona
A back door literally means a third party can read your message.
In theory, it's a good third party, but there's no way to be sure of that.
1wiseguy t1_j9x9z7v wrote
Reply to comment by hodor137 in Signal CEO: We “1,000% won’t participate” in UK law to weaken encryption by ActivePersona
There's no such thing as a secure back door.
A back door is code for "other people can read your message that you thought was secure".
1wiseguy t1_j9wua1g wrote
People in the government who say messages must be encrypted in a manner such that the government can read them doesn't seem to understand how encryption works.
Encryption keeps anybody from reading your messages. That's just how it works.
1wiseguy t1_j9dlf4t wrote
Reply to comment by timberwolf0122 in Amazon Corporate Workers Face Pay Reduction After Shares Slip by brooklynlad
Do you understand that the shareholders own the company?
If you own a coffee shop, are you going to run it in a way that makes you happy, or some other way?
1wiseguy t1_j20g9dy wrote
Reply to comment by wesphilly06 in Earth was brought to life by ancient water-rich asteroids from the outer Solar System by marketrent
If you want to transport water or gases from Earth to Mars, the amount of mass necessary to make a minimal atmosphere or any kind of ground water is staggering and impossible.
Steering an asteroid or comet to collide with Mars is also quite a trick, and finding one that's headed roughly for Mars could take quite a while.
These things are great for a sci-fi story, but in the real world we have laws of physics that we must answer to.
1wiseguy t1_iuedadr wrote
Reply to comment by Teamnoq in Chinese cities brace for wave of Foxconn workers from COVID-hit Zhengzhou by KimCureAll
I thought it was so they didn't have to commute to work.
1wiseguy t1_iscn17m wrote
Reply to Apple slapped with a $19 million fine in Brazil for not selling iPhones with a charger by mepper
Why does anybody, including Brazil, care what accessories Apple provides with a phone?
Was Apple deceptive? Did they show a charger in the picture on the box?
I feel like I'm missing something here.
1wiseguy t1_ja3aft4 wrote
Reply to comment by Sharknado4President in Signal CEO: We “1,000% won’t participate” in UK law to weaken encryption by ActivePersona
There are 3 ways an adversary can read your encrypted message:
Somebody gave them the key, either deliberately or by mistake.
The algorithm is faulty or weak.
The adversary has the resources to do a brute-force attack. That relates somewhat to #2.
All of these can be avoided, if you do it right. Sometimes people don't do it right.