101111010100
101111010100 t1_is01xku wrote
Reply to comment by Basic-Test3104 in [D] Giving Up on Staying Up to Date and Splitting the Field by beezlebub33
brumm brumm, beep bazing
101111010100 t1_ir9axqd wrote
Reply to comment by IntelArtiGen in [R] Google announces Imagen Video, a model that generates videos from text by Erosis
Thank god humanity is still save. Once there are open-source versions, a lot of people will be harmed. /s
101111010100 t1_isiuz6j wrote
Reply to comment by Ifkaluva in [D] Is the GAN architecture currently old-fashioned? by teraRockstar
I think that depends on the dataset. If you train a GAN on faces only, it will give you excellent images of faces. If you train a GAN on ImageNet, it will give you bad faces. It's the same for all kinds of image generation models. At least to my understanding, it's a data issue and not a model issue, but please correct me if I'm wrong.
Edit: I worked with GANs for the last couple of years in my PhD. The faces that sota models produce when trained on ImageNet or CoCo look like crap. They look similarly bad as the faces I get when I try out the stable diffusion web demo.