Submitted by Roflkopt3r t3_125h24e in nottheonion
Search
4 results for retractionwatch.com:
CharlesOSmith t1_j503c3s wrote
Reply to comment by magicfeistybitcoin in What's the current scientific consensus on resveratrol extending lifespan? by pixeleos
field around 2012](https://www.nutraingredients.com/Article/2012/01/13/7-years.-26-journal-articles.-145-fraud-instances.-The-heart-of-a-resveratrol-research-scandal) which was closely followed by the watchdog site [retractionwatch](https://retractionwatch.com/2012/01/12/resveratrol-fraud-case-update-dipak-das-loses-editors-chair-laywer-issues-statement-refuting-all-charges/). Now while one researcher publishing fraudulent data does not mean the entire field of research is wrong
290077 t1_j6tc1d6 wrote
Reply to comment by TheNinjaPro in How to be a sceptic | We have an ethical responsibility to adopt a sceptical attitude to everything from philosophy and science to economics and history in the pursuit of a good life for ourselves and others. by IAI_Admin
retractionwatch.com/the-retraction-watch-leaderboard/ You're telling me none of these passed peer review? Look at the timelines, several of these took over a decade between publication and retraction
uselessteacher t1_izjau82 wrote
Reply to [OC] How to spot misleading charts? I would like to hear your opinion on the subject, also any tips design-wise? by dark_o3
using “T” as standard errors bar and tell you the data is just made up.](https://retractionwatch.com/2022/12/05/a-paper-used-capital-ts-instead-of-error-bars-but-wait-theres-more/)