Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ShowMeTheToes t1_j6hocse wrote

That's for OUR military budget. Why are we paying for someone else's military budget? Don't you see a problem with this?

−1

NickyRD t1_j6hrwcc wrote

The purpose of the military budget is to mitigate risk to ones country. The risk to America is being significantly weakened for the cost of sending old equipment to an ally. In terms of affecting Russian military. Gathering gold standard data. And creating new allies and stealing a spot on the game board. It's a massive bargain for America right now

6

ShowMeTheToes t1_j6htpqp wrote

Where are you seeing that it's old equipment?

−3

NickyRD t1_j6i7wj6 wrote

It's old in so much that a lot of the machinery is undergoing refitting or replacement, or does not fit anticipated future theatre like disputed islands etc.

And some of it, though in use, is just literally old. The M2 Bradley is 40 years old and current model was updated 20 years ago. New machinery is being sought to replace the Bradley and Abrams etc.

That's not to say new equipment isn't being sent. It is! And again it is getting a lot done for it's money. It's the best sales pitch there is.

2

bombmk t1_j6kcg61 wrote

On the job material testing without the risk to trained manpower. That alone will cover the actual cost of the material being sent.

2