The West supplies Ukraine with weapons, so in response Russia commits war crimes.

Perhaps if Putin wasn't attacking civilian targets, he might have the weaponry to prevent Ukraine having any further success on the battlefield.

[deleted]

Is this really news or the daily reality of being a victim of ruzzian greed?

Seems like they're doing what they can to ensure the new tanks slam into them in "full-force retribution" mode.

[removed]

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 86%. (I'm a bot)

> Russia launched a wave of missiles at Ukraine on Thursday, a day after Germany and the US pledged tanks to aid Kyiv's fight against the invasion.

> A day earlier, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz promised to provide Ukraine with 14 Leopard 2 tanks, following weeks of international pressure.

> Speaking on the same programme, Nato Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said sending tanks to Ukraine would make a big difference to the country's ability to win the war.

Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: Ukraine^#1 Tank^#2 Russia^#3 missile^#4 Thursday^#5

So in a war is 30 missiles a lot? This seems like ok Russia, one of the largest militaries shot 30 missiles today. I would imagine a lot more would be sent in a large conflict. And Canada is sending 4 tanks..is that supposed to make a difference? What if our other 4 tanks break down then we have none.

Russia does this anyway regarless of anything Ukraine or the west does. It's a daily occurrence, not a result of.

[removed]

Some dipshit on Twitter posted a map and said that Russia was justified in what it was doing because it was “surrounded by enemies”. Like, buddy, how do you think that many countries became enemies of Russia in the first place?

For example if you hit weapons supply chain instead of residential building, you have much more chances to win