Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_j6o4fzj wrote

Well dont mind us making our own nuclear bombs then that U.S fought us on. At this point it feels like some are more interested in giving Russia the middlefinger than the actual safety of these countries. You should know by now they intend to use those nuclear on us, so we would be held hostage in that situation, without the protection we simply has to stay out meaning we cant have nato on our soil as that puts an target on us with no proper protection. What would deter them from trying then? Nothing really, we would be guessing, russia might be tempted and guess what, then we would absolutely have to make a hard choice and that's sad, because we do not want to be put in this position again but not surprised the zero care in this situation for the possible outcome of such a sollution and what would happen to all us us, it would affect everyone. And you bring in Iceland they dont fucking have a military.

1

spiteful_rr_dm_TA t1_j6o4tkz wrote

You do realize there are more options than NATO, ruzzia, or strict neutrality, right? That countries are capable of signing mutual defense treaties outside of NATO? Sweden and Finland can each or both sign mutual defense treaties with the US and other NATO members independently, and use that as the same level of safety that NATO can provide

1