CrimsonShrike t1_j2ffwy3 wrote
Reply to comment by uncastsacrumf09 in Air-raid siren sounds in Ukraine, Russian missile launches reported by HarakenQQ
US and some NATO countries, otherwise not really. Few countries can actually deploy an effective force outside their borders (and only the US can really wage war on the other side of the globe with a near peer on short notice)
BrokenWineGlass t1_j2fgvit wrote
> (and only the US can really wage war on the other side of the globe with a near peer on short notice)
Wage a war on the other side of the globe on a short notice, sure. They factually confirmed US Military can do this. But with a near peer? Maybe they and military experts claim US Military can do it, but has this ever been tested before? (just a genuine question, no snark, no opinion, just curious about military history).
CrimsonShrike t1_j2fvx1h wrote
Depending on scale of conflict carrier groups on their own can wage war as soon as they get to position. It's a fair question.
Theres elements of the Gulf War that point at that capability as the US was able to organize an armed response to defend its allies in the area really quick. While there were 5 months between loss of Kuwait and combat operations, that has to do with desire to build an arab coalition as well as obtain UN backing (which gave Iraq until january to pull their troops back anyway)
That's of course, assuming we consider Iraq a near peer. China seems a more obvious choice but at least Iraq had proven gear and troops with field experience. I dont imagine Russia would fare any better than Iraq did either.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments