Submitted by defenestrate_urself t3_zsl75t in worldnews
recockulous-too t1_j1a28iz wrote
Reply to comment by Soytaco in WTO on ‘Thin Ice’ With Metals-Tariff Ruling, US Trade Chief Says by defenestrate_urself
Yes I agree with your other reason but it wouldn’t be a National security reason.
Subsidizing the steel industry is the same as tariffs as far as the WTO is concerned. But instead of the tax payers paying for it, it would be by companies and end users of the steel and aluminum. You can say that the consumer ultimately pays the same but the main difference is that the consumer has a choice whether or not to use it without increasing national debt.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments