Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Slippydippytippy t1_j1xbt14 wrote

>circumspect

Kinda the opposite actually. Your position is inherently bluff-calling with massive stakes.

1

lilrabbitfoofoo t1_j1xjk97 wrote

Fearmongering drivel. Just like the other ignorant dolt.

−1

Slippydippytippy t1_j1xmkw9 wrote

Wait, you don't think it's bluff-calling?🤭

>Fearmongering drivel

Which part? What are the chances you are wrong, and what are the consequences of that? What happens when you are 10% wrong? Where are you getting this information about the condition of weapons? What would be the greater consequences of the conflict if you are right? What would be the greater consequences of the conflict if you are wrong? What's the longue duree?

This isn't a gotcha. This are the super basic critical questions. Making an association between calls to think and fear is more of a self-own than anything else

Edit: The self-own bit was prophetic. Look at the fear of questions and fragile hubris on display. What kind of idiot would say "I have the information on my profile" and then block? 0% chance you were telling the truth

0

lilrabbitfoofoo t1_j1xmycc wrote

> What are the chances you are wrong

0%

I've been posting about this and the information to back it up for almost a year now.

Your ignorance and cowardice is not my problem.

Tagged. Ignored. Blocked.

0