Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

lilrabbitfoofoo t1_j1wnsi8 wrote

Reply to comment by unReasonableBreak in Russian forces destroy Azot chemical plant in Severodonetsk by sviterochec

> The Russia a war with NATO would definitely see the usage of Nukes, mass death and destruction and utter cataclysm,

Your ignorance and fearmongering is pure nonsense.

−14

unReasonableBreak t1_j1woka9 wrote

If NATO entered the equation with a hot war the Russian would lose ground so quickly I couldn't imagine them not attempting Nuclear Strikes in some form.

Even if they get one or two strikes they will kill millions in a second.

Calling that fear mongering and ignorance is pretty astonishing frankly it's called the reality we live in...

8

DirtyBeastie t1_j1wzpty wrote

The Russian leadership, who are all too cowardly to go anywhere near the front in Ukraine, are certainly not brave enough to commit suicide by nuclear attack.

2

lilrabbitfoofoo t1_j1wxpe9 wrote

> I couldn't imagine them not attempting Nuclear Strikes in some form.

That's because, in your ignorance, you don't realize that Russia's nuclear deterrent isn't in any better shape than their conventional one.

>Calling that fear mongering and ignorance is pretty astonishing frankly it's called the reality we live in...

No, that's the reality from FORTY years ago. Not only do current nuclear weapons not generate the same kinds of radioactive fallout anymore, but the Russians may not even have a functional nuclear arsenal anymore at all.

The USA has already warned Russia what will happen if they use even a small tactical device in Ukraine.

In other words, you're peddling PUTIN's fearmongering agenda here and I'm calling you out on it.

So, either you are ignorant or you're a Putin stooge. Which is it? Because you honestly are decades out of date on this topic.

−5

Slippydippytippy t1_j1wypq4 wrote

>may

0

lilrabbitfoofoo t1_j1wz196 wrote

> may

I'm being circumspect because this is a public forum.

0

Slippydippytippy t1_j1xbt14 wrote

>circumspect

Kinda the opposite actually. Your position is inherently bluff-calling with massive stakes.

1

lilrabbitfoofoo t1_j1xjk97 wrote

Fearmongering drivel. Just like the other ignorant dolt.

−1

Slippydippytippy t1_j1xmkw9 wrote

Wait, you don't think it's bluff-calling?🤭

>Fearmongering drivel

Which part? What are the chances you are wrong, and what are the consequences of that? What happens when you are 10% wrong? Where are you getting this information about the condition of weapons? What would be the greater consequences of the conflict if you are right? What would be the greater consequences of the conflict if you are wrong? What's the longue duree?

This isn't a gotcha. This are the super basic critical questions. Making an association between calls to think and fear is more of a self-own than anything else

Edit: The self-own bit was prophetic. Look at the fear of questions and fragile hubris on display. What kind of idiot would say "I have the information on my profile" and then block? 0% chance you were telling the truth

0

lilrabbitfoofoo t1_j1xmycc wrote

> What are the chances you are wrong

0%

I've been posting about this and the information to back it up for almost a year now.

Your ignorance and cowardice is not my problem.

Tagged. Ignored. Blocked.

0