Submitted by sviterochec t3_zwfr4u in worldnews
YoureMakingThisUp t1_j1uex04 wrote
Looting is part of the business model of the Russian Army, along with grift, torture, and the murder of civilians. Will the west only supply and fund the war instead of taking action?
rubysteeler19 t1_j1vgmdl wrote
Supplying and funding is an action and far from insignificant. It has allowed Ukraine to conduct meaningful offensive operations these last few months and recapture a ton of territory. NATO getting involved directly will lead to WW3, and it's completely unnecessary as Ukraine is managing the war effectively. Send more arms.
unReasonableBreak t1_j1w7w3n wrote
Exactly, as much as we all would like to think we could steamroll The Russia a war with NATO would definitely see the usage of Nukes, mass death and destruction and utter cataclysm, it would trigger events across the globe as power vacuums were created and super powers distracted, wars would break out everywhere, China at Taiwan, Israel and Iran in a hot war, Pakistan and India and could possibly end civilization we know it.
Ukraine is suffering, but they are winning at this point, just keep the money and arms flowing, they got this.
lilrabbitfoofoo t1_j1wnsi8 wrote
> The Russia a war with NATO would definitely see the usage of Nukes, mass death and destruction and utter cataclysm,
Your ignorance and fearmongering is pure nonsense.
unReasonableBreak t1_j1woka9 wrote
If NATO entered the equation with a hot war the Russian would lose ground so quickly I couldn't imagine them not attempting Nuclear Strikes in some form.
Even if they get one or two strikes they will kill millions in a second.
Calling that fear mongering and ignorance is pretty astonishing frankly it's called the reality we live in...
DirtyBeastie t1_j1wzpty wrote
The Russian leadership, who are all too cowardly to go anywhere near the front in Ukraine, are certainly not brave enough to commit suicide by nuclear attack.
lilrabbitfoofoo t1_j1wxpe9 wrote
> I couldn't imagine them not attempting Nuclear Strikes in some form.
That's because, in your ignorance, you don't realize that Russia's nuclear deterrent isn't in any better shape than their conventional one.
>Calling that fear mongering and ignorance is pretty astonishing frankly it's called the reality we live in...
No, that's the reality from FORTY years ago. Not only do current nuclear weapons not generate the same kinds of radioactive fallout anymore, but the Russians may not even have a functional nuclear arsenal anymore at all.
The USA has already warned Russia what will happen if they use even a small tactical device in Ukraine.
In other words, you're peddling PUTIN's fearmongering agenda here and I'm calling you out on it.
So, either you are ignorant or you're a Putin stooge. Which is it? Because you honestly are decades out of date on this topic.
Slippydippytippy t1_j1wypq4 wrote
>may
lilrabbitfoofoo t1_j1wz196 wrote
> may
I'm being circumspect because this is a public forum.
Slippydippytippy t1_j1xbt14 wrote
>circumspect
Kinda the opposite actually. Your position is inherently bluff-calling with massive stakes.
lilrabbitfoofoo t1_j1xjk97 wrote
Fearmongering drivel. Just like the other ignorant dolt.
Slippydippytippy t1_j1xmkw9 wrote
Wait, you don't think it's bluff-calling?ðŸ¤
>Fearmongering drivel
Which part? What are the chances you are wrong, and what are the consequences of that? What happens when you are 10% wrong? Where are you getting this information about the condition of weapons? What would be the greater consequences of the conflict if you are right? What would be the greater consequences of the conflict if you are wrong? What's the longue duree?
This isn't a gotcha. This are the super basic critical questions. Making an association between calls to think and fear is more of a self-own than anything else
Edit: The self-own bit was prophetic. Look at the fear of questions and fragile hubris on display. What kind of idiot would say "I have the information on my profile" and then block? 0% chance you were telling the truth
lilrabbitfoofoo t1_j1xmycc wrote
> What are the chances you are wrong
0%
I've been posting about this and the information to back it up for almost a year now.
Your ignorance and cowardice is not my problem.
Tagged. Ignored. Blocked.
[deleted] t1_j1xwwfc wrote
[removed]
TROPtastic t1_j1vc75o wrote
According to Ukraine's head of the armed forces, Ukraine most needs non-escalatory armoured vehicles, not intervention from NATO. They have the will and the people to fight, but are held back by the lack of equipment to conduct offensives in an intelligent way (so, not using thousands of people as cannon fodder against defensive lines like the Russians).
SwitPosting t1_j1vjg1c wrote
Ukraine has shown that they have the skill and the spirit to defeat Russia without direct intervention from NATO as long as they're supplied with weapons and equipment. NATO intervention would probably lead to a nuclear exchange anyway.
DirkDiggyBong t1_j1v13ai wrote
The west are also providing intelligence that's proving instrumental in the success of the UA.
particular-potatoe t1_j1v23iz wrote
What action won’t possibly result in the use of nuclear weapons?
MoonManMooner t1_j1vd8vq wrote
That’s a quick way to a nuclear exchange.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments