Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Godsarefakezz t1_j0xf7yk wrote

Damn do they really have to do this? It’s so tacky .

2

Thue t1_j0yuwop wrote

How is it tacky? The money has always had the reigning monarch on it.

Tacky would be not to do it, to wallow in nostalgia about the previous monarch, in deliberate ignorance of the current status.

4

Godsarefakezz t1_j0yxf1x wrote

How is that tacky?

1

Thue t1_j0yxkz2 wrote

Worshiping old things instead of the current status quo just seems kinda bizarre to me.

2

Godsarefakezz t1_j0yxnru wrote

Worshiping old things instead of worshiping new things. What’s the difference?

1

Thue t1_j0yxvjw wrote

Going out of your way to keep Elizabeth II on, even after she should not normally be, is more worshipful than just putting the current King on as is normal.

1

nim_opet t1_j0ymzu0 wrote

They don’t have to. There’s no law requiring it

2