tevinodevost t1_ixusng7 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in China's widening COVID curbs trigger public pushback by reuters
I said undervaccinated in my comment.
Secondly compare the %s of people in each category to %s of deaths and you'll find unvaccinated and then undervaccinated over-represented in the deaths column.
"Pandemic of the unvaccinated" was true. We know this.
dmkown23 t1_ixuvc9w wrote
Pandemic of the unvaccinated was never true you're just regurgitating propaganda. In the UK most of the people who died (after the 'vaccines' were made available) had been given at least one dose. Also most of those hospitalized (from or with covid) were also fully or partially 'vaccinated'. The unvaccinated did no worse and may have the added benefit of avoiding the many side effects.
tevinodevost t1_ixva2mj wrote
Herman. Cain. Awards.
When unvaccinated people disproportionately die (die beyond their numbers) that is a pandemic of the unvaccinated and you know it to be true.
> In the UK most of the people who died (after the 'vaccines' were made available) had been given at least one dose.
What part of undervaccinated is not clear here? It's not good to be not-up-to-date on vaccines!
> The unvaccinated did no worse and may have the added benefit of avoiding the many side effects.
A redditor told you the fallacy of " Also most of those hospitalized (from or with covid) were also fully or partially 'vaccinated'" because that doesn't account for the percentage of each population. When unvaccinated die out of proportion of their makeup of the population that IS a pandemic of the unvaccinated.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments