Submitted by The_Food_Scientist t3_z8rs07 in worldnews
teaklog2 t1_iyfd6lv wrote
Reply to comment by wrosecrans in Letter bomb explodes in Ukranian embassy in Madrid by The_Food_Scientist
Going to jump in and argue the grammar here specifically, in an ‘or’ statement like that the ‘serious’ can also modify both things being listed.
‘i want to buy a red car or truck’ does not imply you want a red car or any colored truck
‘an accretive merger or acquisition’ - doesn’t imply you don’t care if the acquisition is accretive or not
unless you are saying if you want to say ‘I want to buy a red car, table, blanket, and shirt!’ you should instead say ‘i want to buy a red car, a red table, a red blanket, and a red shirt!’
if you want to remove that assumption from your sentence, you could instead say ‘a truck or a red car’ or ‘a red car or any colored truck.’
wrosecrans t1_iyfejq3 wrote
In that case, the reading is that a wartime casualty can only happen in a "serious war," and someone killed in a minor border conflict wouldn't count as a casualty. Is that a reasonable reading of the definition?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments