Submitted by The_Food_Scientist t3_z8rs07 in worldnews
24offsuit t1_iydzlcm wrote
Reply to comment by druizzz in Letter bomb explodes in Ukranian embassy in Madrid by The_Food_Scientist
Untrue.
The far left AND far right are somewhat pro-Putin or anti-NATO and against support to Ukraine, albeit for totally different reasons. There is a crossover. It's kind of weird and on the fringe for both the left and the right but there is a small element on both sides.
ACCount82 t1_iyeqap4 wrote
And people still try to say that horseshoe theory is wrong.
1994mat t1_iyf5dns wrote
it's not horseshoe theory where theres this 2 far outer edges coming back together, it's one straight line with the far-left and far-right being super anti western establishment and wanting more populist brainrot
dymdymdymdym t1_iyf3nia wrote
It is, there are times where it makes some convenient mirages though.
bjornbamse t1_iyf4c1w wrote
Depends on what is understood as horseshoe theory. Both sides arrive at the same solution, but for very different reasons.
ACCount82 t1_iyf6zlf wrote
I don't think it's a stretch to say that many radicals are similar to each other - not in declared ideals, but in observable methods and behaviors. There's a point when this radical zeal and "anti-establishment" thinking overrides any other thought process.
Which is how radical right and radical left have managed to converge on hating NATO and sucking it up to Putin in many countries. As they did before on COVID restrictions, and long before that on trying to "cancel" media for wrongthink, and before that, and before that. Radicalization is enemy of thinking - which horseshoe theory illustrates.
[deleted] t1_iye7l0s wrote
[deleted]
24offsuit t1_iye91c4 wrote
I meant that, pro-Putin / anti-nato depending on political leaning. I'll edit my post to make it clearer.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments