Solecism_Allure t1_iycw38e wrote
For comparison how much western or EU assets are tied up in Russia?
KerbalFrog t1_iydeniz wrote
The problem is this move brings instability to the entire idea of the international financial system, you cant just seize a country assets, otherwise one day a country may just decide not to pay back the credors it dpesnt like, and stuff like that.
anti-DHMO-activist t1_iydgmtp wrote
Not true, seizing assets has been done for as long as there was money.
This is not a new concept, there's a reason the majority of countries have laws for that on the books already.
raven_oscar t1_iye2w5w wrote
Seizing is one thing spending on behalf is another one. Next step is to explane gulf states and china why should they invest in eu assets.
anti-DHMO-activist t1_iye4i6h wrote
Something that only gets claimed by random people on the internet, but not by people actually familiar with the details.
This move is absolutely not unprecedented, no matter how often you guys claim it is. And thankfully, european legislators are aware of that.
[deleted] t1_iye0hbw wrote
[removed]
zzlab t1_iye4xt0 wrote
Pull out of Europe and invest where? Name me a country that you would put more trust in to not seize your assets
anti-DHMO-activist t1_iye3xva wrote
To properly contextualize this comment:
It's a low-karma account active in russia-related threads, primarily being in a spiteful pro-russian position. They for example said:
No further engagement neccessary I guess.
semiomni t1_iyeu7t6 wrote
Bigger threat to stability than forcefully seizing a countries assets and land and people?
KerbalFrog t1_iyexi3v wrote
I dont think anyone is implying that, and thats why we should arm Ukraine for has long has needed.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments