Submitted by TheTelegraph t3_z5vpjs in worldnews
warrkrack t1_ixysnux wrote
Reply to comment by killerbeeman in Snake Island defenders freed in prisoner swap with Russia by TheTelegraph
but they surrendred without a fight? i dont get it.
killerbeeman t1_ixyucgb wrote
I thought they were launching missiles knowing the were out numbered and could lead to their death. Don’t know much about the specifics of their capture.
warrkrack t1_ixyvi76 wrote
I mean... if they put up a fight I would think there would be at least 1 casualty... or if they didn't surrender I would expect there to be less than 100% captured?
BasvanS t1_ixztsz5 wrote
Why do you insist on a need for casualties?
[deleted] t1_iy0uip2 wrote
[removed]
warrkrack t1_iy1zsbf wrote
i dont need casualites. and im not saying they did anything wrong by surrendring. i just dont understand how they are heroes for not surredring... and at the same time they did surrender without a fight.
BasvanS t1_iy29mz6 wrote
They made a stand against an overwhelming force and gave hope to a nation under siege. Why do you assume there was no fight?
warrkrack t1_iy2bxh4 wrote
because there was no fight. they were all captured trying to flee the island
BasvanS t1_iy2dptw wrote
They didn’t do enough pew-pew and bleeding for your taste?
warrkrack t1_iy2fdib wrote
it's not a matter of taste. or what I want. like I said a few times. I don't think they did anything wrong by surrendering. it just makes 0 sence that they are heros for not surrendering... wile surrendering.
[deleted] t1_ixzt9to wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments