Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ziptofaf t1_iufw6gk wrote

>also the war is pretty much a stalemate right now, ukraine isn’t really “kicking ass” they’ve just got 30+ billion in artillery and overhead support which slowly halts Russia’s advances

Technically speaking - as long as Russia is not winning it means it's losing. If your offensive war comes to a halt and 950 soldiers today just turned into minced meat for NOTHING then you can't keep it up forever. You need territorial gains because you lose long term.

On the other hand if Ukraine is not losing - it's winning. They can send their new recruits for training all over Europe, they receive additional equipment over time and they are slowly but steadily bleeding Russia dry. Especially since under all the sanctions Russia finds it difficult to replace their equipment. They can throw more untrained conscripts (and they CAN'T afford to train them properly if there's a risk of Ukraine being able to break the stalemate, they need to be using them on a daily basis) into meatgrinder. But this is a very costly tactic if it doesn't lead to any major victories.

11

[deleted] t1_iug001b wrote

[deleted]

−2

Velvet_Rhyno t1_iug22oy wrote

If they have such a large stockpile, why are they using old WW2 shit from museums? Why are they getting rockets and drones from Iran?

9

Dazzling-Ad4701 t1_iuga3pf wrote

you're in the wrong community for this kind of thing. nothing about allowing putin to win would be good for ukraine or the parts of the world that share values with it. nothing about accepting today's status quo would be good either.

2