Submitted by Vegeta9001 t3_yh09ci in worldnews
EGO_Prime t1_iubu4bf wrote
Reply to comment by ok46reddit in Poland chooses US to build its first nuclear power plant by Vegeta9001
Per Watt generated they use more resources. Again, per Watt generated, not overall. Most large scale plants generate GWs of power with each core being close to a full GW or more, where SMBs are in the low hundreds of MWs. Larger plants are able to leverage their scale to reduce resources for the secondary and support items, like the power distribution or large scale cooling systems, the later get significantly cheaper and less resource intensive with larger size. So it does costs more for the whole (large) site, but when you break the cost down per Watt of generated power, larger sites will tend to be cheaper to both build and operate.
SMRs do potentially have additional safety features though, so it's possible operational costs might be less. But material costs won't be smaller, you still need containment system, turbines, transformers sub-stations, etc. They'll be smaller because there's less load, but when you scale that up to the same output of a large plant, you'll need more resources for the same power output.
I'm not trying to knock SMRs. A single plant is cheaper to build, but it also generates significantly less power then a larger unit, with many of the same design and zoning constraints.
ok46reddit t1_iubwfvl wrote
Again. SMRs do not use more resources.
The resources consumed do not only include materials used in the reactor, but also in the surrounding infrastructure.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments