Submitted by flabbywoofwoof t3_yeefzt in worldnews
ssschilke t1_ityw02r wrote
We need a male quota immediately!!!
mtgguy999 t1_ityxj00 wrote
Yeah we need to think of a way to attract more men so it’s even. I have an idea how about we pay men more!
[deleted] t1_iu0rase wrote
[removed]
tinybluntneedle t1_itztkgs wrote
This is an election, genius.
ssschilke t1_itzu6f4 wrote
And that was sarcasm, clever dick
flabbywoofwoof OP t1_ityxcgp wrote
There's been one since the beginning of humankind.
RichBitchRichBitch t1_itzfgvj wrote
That’s not a quota, lady, that’s just nature
tinybluntneedle t1_itzsuxx wrote
You misspelled patriarchy.
Dragmire800 t1_iu0nxfe wrote
If a patriarchy is something that has developed in every society since societies started existing, does that not imply a patriarchy is nature? Most social animals exist in a social system where one gender is dominant.
FloppedYaYa t1_iu1x8dg wrote
Christ
tinybluntneedle t1_iu0rm0p wrote
Not really. Plenty of societies were either egalitarian or downright matriarchal but with colonization and occupation from a select few, the culture changed. And that's not accounting for the abrahamic religions which spread with fundamentally misogynystic practices thus changing the societal balances for the last 2000 years.
You might think it is nature but in recent decades, with women getting into positions of power, it has been statistically proven that either companies, businesses and even governments and negotiations ran by women, are considerably more effective and economically fruitful than those run by men. We are weakened physically due to our reproductive features, and that's what the patriarchy exploited (and still does in some places today by erasing any form of reproductive health access) but that doesn't make a world ran exclusively by men the better alternative. And i'm not saying we need to run the entire world without men. Too much work when we already have to carry the weight of our civilization on our backs. Let's do this 50/50 where each pulls their weight.
wam_bam_mam t1_iu335kz wrote
> Not really. Plenty of societies were either egalitarian or downright matriarchal
Where the hell did you get this from, even in tribes the chief would be a male, they used to have oracles who used to be female.
All tubes always had a structure chief, soldiers, workers/artisans.
MAMBAMENTALITY8-24 t1_itz20qo wrote
Clearly a joke
flabbywoofwoof OP t1_iu02m57 wrote
I invoke Poe's Law.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments