Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

DragonDai t1_iuhpgpa wrote

He was convicted but the conviction was overturned because it was fraudulent. So he is technically an ex-con but not in the traditional sense. He was once convicted of a crime, but he was later cleared of the charges.

See here for more info:

https://old.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/yhvgif/_/iug7q22

6

Lord-of-war-Ares t1_iuirl8u wrote

case was dropped due to loophole , not because he was acquitted of the crimes

2

DragonDai t1_iuis9se wrote

You are wrong. Again, I'll refer you to that link, but the general gist is that the only material witness recounted his testimony and the judge was crooked.

2

Lord-of-war-Ares t1_iuisl9q wrote

there were 8 judges and they read his crimes for 4 hours , the only crook was his friend in the supreme court got him out of prison because the trial was supposed to take place in Brasilia instead of Curitiba , he got him out on technicality , not because he was proven innocent

1

DragonDai t1_iuisv0x wrote

You can deny the truth all you like, it doesn't make it not the truth. The man was convicted by a crooked judge, the conviction was overturned because the only material evidence was fabricated, and he is a free man without that crime on his record.

Keep believing the lies you're being fed of you want. We're done here.

1