Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Redbanabandana t1_iu4tp7a wrote

> Cultural genocide is still genocide

By name, not by definition

−4

Cherios_Are_My_Shit t1_iu5890f wrote

>The definition contained in Article II of the Convention describes genocide as a crime committed with the intent to destroy a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, in whole or in part.

destruction of language or literature, banning of clothing or foods, rules against public congregation have all been ruled genocide by the UN.

saying cultural genocide isn't genocide is like saying oral rape isn't rape

2

Redbanabandana t1_iu5kcaz wrote

Putting cultural genocide on the same level as genocide is like saying an unwanted kiss on the cheek is the same as being forcibly penetrated by a chainsaw

>The definition contained in Article II of the Convention describes genocide as a crime committed with the intent to destroy a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, in whole or in part.

The bolded part is pretty important.

>destruction of language or literature, banning of clothing or foods, rules against public congregation have all been ruled genocide by the UN.

Oh, like during the pandemic? TIL I was genocided according to the UN

BTW, the convention linked in the article makes no mention of cultural genocide or what that could mean so...

−3