Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Opposite_Ad_3715 t1_itubig9 wrote

Reply to comment by nick5erd in 'Ready for anything': US aircraft carrier crew training for war with Russia but aims to deter threats by MGC91

The war games and simulated missions we use in Europe are hella unfair, based on reports they will literally summon enemies from nowhere, teleport them, and give them unrealistic advantages to force the trainees to think in their feet, it’s why most war games end in an unfavorable scenario

13

nick5erd t1_itucf7q wrote

Maybe, but if you want to use your aircraft carrier you have go near the cost, and there is no chance to find a small, quietly submarine there. Or in the scenario of the Russian flagship, Ukraine just use more than one missle and a drone. There is no upper limit to use just more missiles or drones. Aircraft carrier not useful in modern wars outside bombing some stone age culture.

−7

Cuddlebeasts t1_itufox2 wrote

… aircraft carriers will never get close to a coast. Carriers during the Iraq war from what I recall were “parked” in Turkey, nowhere close to Iraq. And you’re comparing the sunken Russian Moskva to a US aircraft carrier…? Far from apples to apples. Again, included in a carrier battle group are anti-air ships (and the aircraft from the carrier itself). A drone will have a hard time getting close.

16

StewGoFast t1_itug0rt wrote

Certified arm chair general here. Grammar and spelling on point to go along with it. Hope the US Navy hires you as a consultant. Don’t take anything less than $1 billion an hour for your immense expertise.

14

nick5erd t1_itunhuz wrote

You don't get it. My theory is, that this kind of weapon is build to conquer resources and land from people not able to defend them self. It is not for defend themselves from anybody able to attack. We have to discuss it, because it is built for future crimes of the US.

−9

noneyabuiznezz t1_itvz2ug wrote

Your theory is beyond dumb. Carrier battlegroups are huge, their defenders are also massive as the can be ground based defence systems (depending if they have support from the coast) it’s own aircraft it launches also acts as a deterrent and defensive mechanism, then you got multiple ships that are built around the idea of protecting themselves and others through C-RAMS, missile systems and jamming abilities.

There’s a reason why aircraft carriers are still around and the fact that your pathetic mind can’t grasp the reason why is just mind bogglingly stupid.

8

nick5erd t1_itwcx85 wrote

Stupid?

−1

QuantumWaveFormCat t1_itwze3t wrote

I thought Russian trolls were supposed to be better than this? Putler must really be scraping the bottom of the barrel.

7