Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

autotldr t1_je9zeoc wrote

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 74%. (I'm a bot)


> Threat actors aligned with Russia and Belarus are targeting elected US officials supporting Ukraine, using attacks that attempt to compromise their email accounts, researchers from security firm Proofpoint said.

> Raggi declined to identify the targets except to say they included elected US officials and staffers at the federal government level as well as European entities.

> "In several instances among both US and European targeted entities, the individuals targeted by these phishing campaigns are vocal supporters of Ukraine in the Russia/Ukraine War and/or involved in initiatives pertaining to the support of Ukraine on an international stage," he added.


Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: portal^#1 targeted^#2 European^#3 Proofpoint^#4 officials^#5

22

Friendly-Escape-4574 t1_jeae31r wrote

Wonder if we'll see an increase in this with China sending Russia a team of cybersecurity experts

17

ReturnOfSeq t1_jeak6v0 wrote

Nothing new. Russia has been hacking and attacking progressive US officials for at least 8 years

152

Phriend_of_Phoenix t1_jeanyf4 wrote

It kind of is though? No one really bothers with traditional attacks like man in the middle anymore cause it’s much easier to trick someone into giving you their password. The point of hacking is to get access to information on a computer, social engineering attacks do that.

22

Phriend_of_Phoenix t1_jeaq4fm wrote

You at right in the technical sense, but I think you are just nitpicking. If someone convinces grandma to give them her Facebook login, grandma says she got hacked, and would probably call that person a hacker. GPT isn’t really an AI, but we call it that anyways because how society uses words doesn’t stick to a single dictionary definition.

15

Cognomifex t1_jeaskzq wrote

> It kind of is though?

If anything it's person hacking. There are still plenty of ways to go after the tech directly, but as you say generally the weakest point in a system from a security standpoint is the bag of meat operating it.

4

bunkdiggidy t1_jeazr1x wrote

"If you know we exist, and you don't expect us to do this and prepare for it, then you deserve to get hacked." -Russia probably

−6

BigBeerBellyMan t1_jeb2tk0 wrote

The title is sensationalized and misleading though:

There's no way to know the culprits were Pro-Russian.

There's no indication they were Hackers.

They didn't only target US government employees.

No mention if other (not pro-Ukraine) politicians were also targeted, or if it was only those who support the war.

It could just be that US officials were caught in a large drag-net operation.

−16

carpcrucible t1_jebp90n wrote

Very good idea, I'm sure this would never backfire!

2

rikashiku t1_jebpgfq wrote

Nothing new there. Russia have been at it for nearly 10 years.

6

Phriend_of_Phoenix t1_jebrk9j wrote

You have clearly read at least part of the article since you started this thread by claiming phishing is not hacking. The article also states that the group Proofpoint was tracking was at the very least Russia aligned. The scripts they were using were customized to target NATO and NATO aligned organizations. We know they were targeting pro NATO and pro Ukraine officials because they have attacked multiple countries, and all their targets fit that bill. This is in the first two paragraphs of the article.

14

Paranoidnl t1_jeefvus wrote

most likely. and they need to go as well. this standard whataboutism always has the same answer: Everyone that supports russia has to go, don't care what they are or represent. are you a democrat and think that the russian invasion is justified? BYEEEEE. are you a republican and think that the russian invasion is justified? BYEEEEE.

it's not hard. all traitors have to go, a crime is a crime. and this is what will you will hear from any proper progressive. you always have the nutjobs on each end of the spectrum but most level headed progressive people will tell you this.

3