Submitted by Falls_stuff t3_12509jx in worldnews
Reselects420 t1_je1yimn wrote
Reply to comment by Throwaway08080909070 in India’s overall exports crosses an all time high of $750 billion by Falls_stuff
You can’t just make up your own metric of judging whether a country is developed or developing, and decide that everyone should update their dictionary.
Pakistan is a nuclear power with a GDP per capita only a little lower than India’s. Is Pakistan a developed country?
Here, I’ll do one better. Iran. Higher GDP per capita than India, space program, possibly nuclear status soon. Are they a developed country? If not, is it just the figure of exports that matters, not the distribution of that figure?
Throwaway08080909070 t1_je1yruy wrote
> Pakistan is a nuclear power with a GDP per capita only a little lower than India’s. Is Pakistan a developed country?
But they lack a space program and nearly a trillion in exports. And again "per capita" vs "total" is worth acknowledging, even if you reject its role in defining development.
> Here, I’ll do one better. Iran. Higher GDP per capita than India, space program, possibly nuclear status soon. Are they a developed country? If not, is it just the figure of exports that matters, not the distribution of that figure?
It's the combination of factors, as I've said from the start.
meabandit t1_je30b8n wrote
Your definition might work for you but we can't all come ask you when we need to know right? So maybe let's use a common definition, mkay?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments