Rexia2022 t1_j9yivcu wrote on February 25, 2023 at 2:36 PM

Reply to comment by UniquesNotUseful in UK’s Badenoch defends SNP hopeful Forbes’ right to oppose same-sex marriage by DuckTalesFan

> Forbes had the right to say she wouldn't have voted for gay marriage due to religious views, and won't condemn someone expressing their views based on a religious stance

See, this is weasely. She wasn't asked to do that, she was asked if she condemned the views, not the right to express them.

> the more you shine a light on these views and debate

The light was shone, the equalities minister refused to then condemn or debate them.

UniquesNotUseful t1_j9ymgwc wrote on February 25, 2023 at 3:04 PM

There are a lot of nuances in English and they seem to be lost on you. If she made no comment about her own views, I may have seen your point.

You are just being professionally offended at this stage. There is much to criticise but you are turning valid problems into background noise by trying to find issue where there is none.

I asked your views on what Forbes said, you haven't condemned them or even said they were wrong. According to you, I should be claiming that you are anti marriage equality, context indicates that is not the case.

Rexia2022 t1_j9z3gdo wrote on February 25, 2023 at 5:01 PM

> There are a lot of nuances in English and they seem to be lost on you. If she made no comment about her own views, I may have seen your point

You are very easily fooled by political doubletalk.

UniquesNotUseful t1_j9zep7a wrote on February 25, 2023 at 6:15 PM

Well good luck with your life being angry at everything including your imagination. May I suggest you investigate ulcer treatments.

Rexia2022 t1_j9zflkq wrote on February 25, 2023 at 6:21 PM

Ah, but you fail to consider that I said I'm not mad, thus I can't be.